I am thankful for a brief rest from school and the rigors of my schedule this fall. We had a very fun Thanksgiving Day filled with lots of good eats. I have to say this year's turkey was my best yet. That recipe is definitely a keeper. The pumpkin cheesecake and frosted pumpkin cookies turned out great as well. Overall I label the day a complete success.
Thanksgiving evening I stole off to see a late night viewing of the new Harry Potter movie. They did a fantastic job with the effects and all. I am thinking of putting together a piece of work on the spiritual lessons that can be derived from the series so that children can witness to their friends in an understandable manner. The overarching theme for this movie was "Lies of the Enemy" and how he preys on our fears and insecurities when we isolate ourselves from loved ones. I know there is a lot of negative press in Christian circles about Harry Potter and its magical themes, but I think it is naive to think that we can hide our children from its effects. I simply choose to view them all and discuss in depth the principles and content with my children so that they can better understand the difference between right and wrong.
I just enjoyed a visit from my sister, Denise, who is stationed in Guam. We had a really GREAT time together. Naomi and Declan loved hanging out with Aunt Nissie. Denise and I spent some time shopping, went to view the King Tut exhibit at the Denver Art Museum, stuffed ourselves on Brazilian cuisine at Fogo de Chao, and enjoyed the family tradition of unabashedly belting out some karaoke. I did not want to say goodbye come Monday morning, but I am encouraged that she is halfway through her Guam assignment and will be back home in a year and a half. Having Denise visit reminded me of how much I miss living in a place with family around. I love Denver but I sorely miss family. I hope someday we can all live closer together or at least be able to visit one another more often. Family is a treasure.
School has been quite the experience this year. I started off with a lot of momentum and enthusiasm. I am relieved as it enabled me to plow through some of the paper deadlines with flying colors. It has, however, taken a toll on me and I have not been able to devote as much time as I would like to my home and family. I have decided to take a lighter load next semester and to benefit from the intercession classes as well. I will only be taking 3 classes next semester which will allow me to spend more time at home; six was a bit much with a one year old running around. I did it... but I did not enjoy it as much as I would have liked to. And if you know my passion for study, that is saying a LOT!
I am still running even though the weather has dropped below freezing. I simply bought more cold weather running gear and motivated myself with a new Garmin. I find that technology gadgets are a great motivator for any daunting task. I run about five miles a day, five days a week. I would probably run more but that means more time away from home and so I content myself with the 45 minutes of cardio.
We are contemplating selling the house and moving closer to school. The house needs a bit of work before that will be possible so I am working on projects as I can. We put in new energy saving windows this last year and did some painting. Still need some more painting and some features like sinks, carpet, and tiles updated. We are updating the front and back yard landscaping right now. I am not very handy so you can imagine how slow my pace is. Hopefully in about a year we'll have it all done. Wish me luck!
Teaching at church has been a great experience this last year. As part of a teaching team, I teach once a month on the particular topic we are addressing. This year we taught through the fruits of the Spirit, concentrating on each fruit for 4-6 weeks. It has been quite the eyeopener. I never realized how deficient I was in the various fruits or how essential each one is to the functioning of the whole. The fruits do not function as the gifts do, where I am endowed with one but perhaps not another. The fruit of the Spirit is a network of characteristics that are interdependent and must all be formed in each individual. The importance of the fruit is that they are the evidence of our faith and relationship with God. An interesting aspect I came to realize about the fruit is that they are impossible to display outside of relationship with other human beings. I can scream from the mountaintops about my kindness and patience but unless I engage in relationships with others my words can never become actual deed thereby bearing testimony to my relationship with Jesus Christ and they are useless. This Sunday is my last teaching on the fruit of temperance before we move on to a new series. I hope to be able to write up a brief summary of them all with what I have learned once we are finished. This is truly why I love teaching so much, I learn so much in preparation. I am thankful to God for this gift He has given me and I love serving others with it.
I could keep going but I need to get back to studying and writing. Three papers left before the end of the semester and then finals! The end of the tunnel is approaching... I see the light!
Saturday, November 27, 2010
Saturday, October 23, 2010
Nature Prepares for Winter's Respite...I Envy Her Approaching Rest
The weather has finally cooled off in Colorado. Mornings are crisp and clean smelling and the colors of the season are striking in sharp contrasts of reds, yellows, browns, and greens. Every fall I feel this overwhelming urge to pack up and move to the mountains. I have realized of course the futility of doing so. If I move to the mountains I will no longer be able to see the mountains and so must content myself with admiring from afar.
Lots of changes are on the horizon. Declan is finally walking and now getting into everything. (He's trying to climb a stack of boxes in the kitchen as I write.) Words are taking on more form and are somewhat intelligible. "Thank you" is "deet-do" but that's about all I can make out so far. He loves animal crackers, mac and cheese, goldfish, and bananas. I am still trying to accustom to feeding a child who can eat pretty much anything he wants to; such a drastic change from the strict dietary regime we continuously follow with Naomi. Declan seems determined not to ween, which is becoming quite the taxation for me. Although last night he drank a fair amount of whole milk. That was a first for him - he usually takes a sip and then dribbles it down his chest, making a huge mess. I hate to get my hopes up, and I know I will miss the bonding moments with him but I think its time to nudge him forward a bit. I am determined not to be an enabler for him, making sure he matures sufficiently to succeed in life.
Naomi is loving 2nd grade. I am not enjoying it so much. This is the first year I have seriously contemplated homeschooling. I love all the opportunities for her to participate in extracurricular activities like choir, and drum line but feel she is suffering in academics. Hopefully this is an issue we can tactfully address in a parent/teacher conference. I do not want to hurt anyone's feelings but I do not think Naomi is being taught adequately at school. She keeps coming home with homework she has no idea how to complete. I am not one of those parents always siding with my child but I know what she is and is not capable of grasping and these things do not fall into that category. So if any teachers out there have some advice, I would love to hear it.
The holidays are approaching and schedules are filling up quick. Denise will be back from Guam for a few weeks and will have time to visit both Dawn (in VA) and me (in CO) while she is stateside. I cannot wait! I miss my little sis. It sounds like my parents are going to be here a fair amount of time through Thanksgiving and Christmas. I am looking forward to being able to spend some quality time with them before they head off to Brazil.
School is going well for me. I am learning so much in such a short period of time. I lament not being able to just sit and soak a lot of this in at a deeper level but realize the necessity of getting through the material. My favorite classes thus far are Church History and Apologetics. I have always enjoyed history and find it easy to absorb the information we study in class. Apologetics took me entirely by surprise. I love the thinking involved in formulating arguments. I am not however motivated by the quick battering wit of debate and so do not think I have a calling in that area but the research aspect of the discipline has great appeal. Greek is ... well it is Greek. All the languages I have learned so far are best tackled through speech. Since Koine Greek is a dead language I am finding it quite the challenge to remain motivated. Hermeneutics is also a bit dry yet I realize the necessity in it and have already identified several of my "bad habits" in interpretation. I love spiritual insight and having my 'aha' moments but there is not much appreciation for it when it comes to the assignments. It is, however, teaching me to stay on task and not become sidetracked on rabbit trails. Intercultural Ministry is proving to be much more involved than I anticipated. I figured since I was raised on the mission field the class would be somewhat routine. I am learning that much of my perception of missions is outdated and even slightly tainted with theological inconsistencies. I am shocked yet relieved that much of my disdain for missions has been a result of something wrong in my perception and not really anything faulty about it, in and of itself. I am looking forward to applying my new-found knowledge to missions tasks in the future. And last, but most assuredly not least, is Christian Formation (aka mentoring) which I am getting antsy about starting. I have chosen my mentors already and am working on deepening my relationships with those individuals and am really looking forward to gaining some ministerial clarity through the process.
I have a lot of new ideas for blogs but may not get to them until after midterms. I have requests so far for blogs on Meekness, Being Unequally Yoked, Gnosticism's Return, Women and Teaching, and a few others. If there is anything in particular you would like me to study and write on, please let me know and I will add it to the list. Please keep me in prayer as I struggle to maintain momentum in my many tasks this year.
Saturday, September 25, 2010
Godless
Last night I attended my first ever Atheist lecture at Metro State in downtown Denver. I was actually very excited to hear a “lead Atheist” express his beliefs, or as I would later learn, his lack of belief. It is very important to me to understand the points of view of others. If I cannot understand or at least make an attempt to grasp what they believe then I cannot “become all things to all men” and present the gospel in words that meet my audience where they are at. But I was sorely disappointed in the presentation and I think most intelligent Atheists would actually agree with me once I convey my reasons for that impression.
Let me begin with a brief introduction of the speaker. Dan Barker is the author of the book, Godless. Dan is an evangelical preacher turned Atheist and now makes it his mission to convert Christians from Christianity to Atheism. He has served as a pastor in several capacities in both the Friend’s and Assemblies of God denominations. He also writes music and has written several VBS and other children’s musicals under the pseudonym, Edwin Daniels. Dan has a degree in Religion with a minor in NT Greek from Azusa Pacific.
Dan began the lecture by describing the allure in Atheism being its abandon of hierarchical structure and contrasted it to the hierarchy presented in most religions. The religions of Islam, Judaism and Christianity were brought up at this point but that is the last heard of Islam and Judaism. The rest of the lecture focused only on Christianity and his opposition to those beliefs. In reference to his evangelical past, Dan conveyed his enjoyment of his Christian life as wonderful but that “being an Atheist is a lot more fun.” As Mr. Barker walked us through his Christian experience he continuously mocked the 2nd coming of Christ which left me with the impression that perhaps he had been caught up with some of the major Jesus Movements typical of the 60’s and 70’s, and dying out in the 80’s. The waning of that movement seemed to characterize the timing of the waning of Barker’s faith.
Dan invoked Scripture often but usually out of context and misquoted, ignoring other pivotal scriptures such as "No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.”(Mt 24:36) In an attempt to cast doubt on Jesus words “I tell you the truth, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened”(Mt 24:34) as a reference to a 2nd coming, Dan expressed legitimate frustration over every generations impression of living in the end times. However, I would like to interject that the word used for “fulfilled” here is not indicative of a completed action but a bringing into existence similar to that of setting a stage in preparation for a scene to play out. The implication of Jesus' words are then not of completion of events but of circumstances necessary to set a series of events in motion. Before that generation ceased, all events would be set in motion for the beginning of the scene titled “end times”.
Mr. Barker spoke of his intellectual awakening at the age of 30 as the beginning of his process to abandon his faith, giving scientific evidence of a full development of his frontal lobe as a support of the change. In other words, his faith was simple childishness and immaturity. I cannot disagree. I do in fact believe that his faith was childish and immature. But God is not unaware of such physiological developments in humans and in fact waited often to call His servants until they were at least 30 years of age. This pattern is repeated throughout Scripture. I happened to have experienced a similar awakening at the age of 30 but mine seemed to have the opposite effect. I felt the need to “work out my salvation” and intellectually understand why I believed certain truths. I realized at that point in time my extreme love for Theology which has resulted in my attending seminary and pursuing that passion. In articulating this intellectual awakening, Barker sounded angry at his blind faith and jaded by his ignorance. This is understandable. I felt the same way upon searching out my own faith. How could I believe such a thing without exploring it further? My exploration, however only served to strengthen my faith whereas his exploration seemed to have weakened his own faith. Oswald Chambers stated the following:
While many of us may come to the faith out of a level of ignorance or innocence, God never expects us to remain at the state. The growth of one’s faith is very similar to the growth of an infant. We start out ignorant, but at some point in time, we must accept accountability for our actions and beliefs and grow and mature. But this did not happen for Mr. Barker. Instead of the natural progression of growth, he chose to abhor his ignorance and reject the faith completely. Barker referred to his ministry as a “stupid, infantile game.” He now views his state of mind as “intellectually mature” and superior to that of Christians. Here we arrive at the root of humanism - it is the love of one’s own mind as the end-all of faith. I admit to feeling prey to this belief all too often. When we gain intellectual ground it is easy to feel pride in those advances and forget that our minds are a very real reflection of an intellectual God. Instead of turning that pride to a state of humility to an all-knowing Creator, we stop short of that maturity and begin to worship our own intellect. It is natural to feel pride over the intellect, it is part of the image of God but it cannot end there; intellect must credit its source.
None of these issues get at the source of my frustration with the presentation and so now I turn to address that issue. Barker’s platform hinges on the Christian faith. Instead of presenting a set of beliefs and evidences, which is what I came to hear, he presented Atheism as an alternative to Christianity. I find this is a slap in the face of any intellectual advancement as I wanted to know why Atheism stands apart, alone, and superior to Christianity. Barker’s presentation felt parasitic in nature to Christianity, as if his “ministry” could not exist without it. I believe this is a betrayal to Atheism in general and I find it hard to believe a proponent such as Richard Dawkins would align himself with such a leech. The entire aura of the evening felt ‘evangelical’ in nature right down to the manner in which the event was advertised. He played on his past as an evangelical preacher to merit an audience; every expression of his belief had to be a response, counter, or mockery of the Christian faith; and even his upcoming book project is a humanist rebuttal of Rick Warren’s “Purpose Driven Life”.
My faith stands alone; I do not need Atheism to provide a platform for my faith and its expression. I believe this is the nature of truth. I also believe that this is the intent of Richard Dawkins work – that his Atheism can stand alone. So for this reason I cannot understand Mr. Dawkins support of Mr. Barker’s clear insubordination to the independence of Atheism. I found the entire evening fell far short of anything intellectual.
To make matters worse the Q&A portion revealed a multitude of inconsistencies with the lecture.
(1) Q: Why did you choose the truth of Atheism over the comfort of Christianity?
A: His response was in conflict to his opening statement that being an Atheist was simply much more fun than being a Christian. In his response he presented the decision as an absolute yes or no to Jesus (going back to the parasitic nature of his own version of Atheism – he needed Christ in order to even become an Atheist… how ironic.) To put it simply he stated that he “fell in love with his mind” and the Bible was anti-rational.
(2) Q: How do you respond to the accusation that you simply rush to the extremes of evangelical to atheist?
A: He is an evangelist no matter what he believes.
(3) Q: Should we all be conducting outreach – Atheistic Evangelism?
A: If it’s bad for us it’s bad for them (suggesting again that Atheism cannot stand alone and must feed and fuel itself off of Christian tactics.)
(4) Q: What is truth?
A: Truth is not a thing or morality; truth is the degree with which a statement corresponds to reality. The language of proposition must be supported by observation and evidence. Therefore Jesus cannot be truth (and yet another statement uses the foundation of Christianity for its existence).
(5) Q: Christian man came to the microphone at this point and apologized for the hatred Mr. Barker had experienced at the hand of the church and this was not indicative of the love of Jesus Christ.
A: Mr. Barker refused the apology and stated that the young man had no authority to speak for believers. (The demand for an apology carrying the weight of authority seems to be a direct contradiction to his support of the “freethinking” principle of no hierarchy. And yet here he demands the knee of some hierarchical structure to appease him. While I am on that note, how does one become a "lead Atheist" in a framework that recognizes no hierarchy?)
In summation, I felt cheated of the intellectual presentation I showed up to witness and felt more as if I had stumbled in on a locker-room pep talk for Atheists, lacking any substance but full of derision and fluff. My recommendation if you want to find material worthy of the title Atheist, is to look at Richard Dawkin’s work and not the intellectual freeloading of Dan Barker.
Let me begin with a brief introduction of the speaker. Dan Barker is the author of the book, Godless. Dan is an evangelical preacher turned Atheist and now makes it his mission to convert Christians from Christianity to Atheism. He has served as a pastor in several capacities in both the Friend’s and Assemblies of God denominations. He also writes music and has written several VBS and other children’s musicals under the pseudonym, Edwin Daniels. Dan has a degree in Religion with a minor in NT Greek from Azusa Pacific.
Dan began the lecture by describing the allure in Atheism being its abandon of hierarchical structure and contrasted it to the hierarchy presented in most religions. The religions of Islam, Judaism and Christianity were brought up at this point but that is the last heard of Islam and Judaism. The rest of the lecture focused only on Christianity and his opposition to those beliefs. In reference to his evangelical past, Dan conveyed his enjoyment of his Christian life as wonderful but that “being an Atheist is a lot more fun.” As Mr. Barker walked us through his Christian experience he continuously mocked the 2nd coming of Christ which left me with the impression that perhaps he had been caught up with some of the major Jesus Movements typical of the 60’s and 70’s, and dying out in the 80’s. The waning of that movement seemed to characterize the timing of the waning of Barker’s faith.
Dan invoked Scripture often but usually out of context and misquoted, ignoring other pivotal scriptures such as "No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.”(Mt 24:36) In an attempt to cast doubt on Jesus words “I tell you the truth, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened”(Mt 24:34) as a reference to a 2nd coming, Dan expressed legitimate frustration over every generations impression of living in the end times. However, I would like to interject that the word used for “fulfilled” here is not indicative of a completed action but a bringing into existence similar to that of setting a stage in preparation for a scene to play out. The implication of Jesus' words are then not of completion of events but of circumstances necessary to set a series of events in motion. Before that generation ceased, all events would be set in motion for the beginning of the scene titled “end times”.
Mr. Barker spoke of his intellectual awakening at the age of 30 as the beginning of his process to abandon his faith, giving scientific evidence of a full development of his frontal lobe as a support of the change. In other words, his faith was simple childishness and immaturity. I cannot disagree. I do in fact believe that his faith was childish and immature. But God is not unaware of such physiological developments in humans and in fact waited often to call His servants until they were at least 30 years of age. This pattern is repeated throughout Scripture. I happened to have experienced a similar awakening at the age of 30 but mine seemed to have the opposite effect. I felt the need to “work out my salvation” and intellectually understand why I believed certain truths. I realized at that point in time my extreme love for Theology which has resulted in my attending seminary and pursuing that passion. In articulating this intellectual awakening, Barker sounded angry at his blind faith and jaded by his ignorance. This is understandable. I felt the same way upon searching out my own faith. How could I believe such a thing without exploring it further? My exploration, however only served to strengthen my faith whereas his exploration seemed to have weakened his own faith. Oswald Chambers stated the following:
Initially we trust in our ignorance, calling it innocence, and next we trust our innocence, calling it purity. Then when we hear these strong statements from our Lord, we shrink back, saying, “But I never felt any of those awful things in my heart.” We resent what He reveals. Either Jesus Christ is the supreme authority on the human heart, or He is not worth paying any attention to. Am I prepared to trust the penetration of His Word into my heart, or would I prefer to trust my own “innocent ignorance”?
While many of us may come to the faith out of a level of ignorance or innocence, God never expects us to remain at the state. The growth of one’s faith is very similar to the growth of an infant. We start out ignorant, but at some point in time, we must accept accountability for our actions and beliefs and grow and mature. But this did not happen for Mr. Barker. Instead of the natural progression of growth, he chose to abhor his ignorance and reject the faith completely. Barker referred to his ministry as a “stupid, infantile game.” He now views his state of mind as “intellectually mature” and superior to that of Christians. Here we arrive at the root of humanism - it is the love of one’s own mind as the end-all of faith. I admit to feeling prey to this belief all too often. When we gain intellectual ground it is easy to feel pride in those advances and forget that our minds are a very real reflection of an intellectual God. Instead of turning that pride to a state of humility to an all-knowing Creator, we stop short of that maturity and begin to worship our own intellect. It is natural to feel pride over the intellect, it is part of the image of God but it cannot end there; intellect must credit its source.
None of these issues get at the source of my frustration with the presentation and so now I turn to address that issue. Barker’s platform hinges on the Christian faith. Instead of presenting a set of beliefs and evidences, which is what I came to hear, he presented Atheism as an alternative to Christianity. I find this is a slap in the face of any intellectual advancement as I wanted to know why Atheism stands apart, alone, and superior to Christianity. Barker’s presentation felt parasitic in nature to Christianity, as if his “ministry” could not exist without it. I believe this is a betrayal to Atheism in general and I find it hard to believe a proponent such as Richard Dawkins would align himself with such a leech. The entire aura of the evening felt ‘evangelical’ in nature right down to the manner in which the event was advertised. He played on his past as an evangelical preacher to merit an audience; every expression of his belief had to be a response, counter, or mockery of the Christian faith; and even his upcoming book project is a humanist rebuttal of Rick Warren’s “Purpose Driven Life”.
My faith stands alone; I do not need Atheism to provide a platform for my faith and its expression. I believe this is the nature of truth. I also believe that this is the intent of Richard Dawkins work – that his Atheism can stand alone. So for this reason I cannot understand Mr. Dawkins support of Mr. Barker’s clear insubordination to the independence of Atheism. I found the entire evening fell far short of anything intellectual.
To make matters worse the Q&A portion revealed a multitude of inconsistencies with the lecture.
(1) Q: Why did you choose the truth of Atheism over the comfort of Christianity?
A: His response was in conflict to his opening statement that being an Atheist was simply much more fun than being a Christian. In his response he presented the decision as an absolute yes or no to Jesus (going back to the parasitic nature of his own version of Atheism – he needed Christ in order to even become an Atheist… how ironic.) To put it simply he stated that he “fell in love with his mind” and the Bible was anti-rational.
(2) Q: How do you respond to the accusation that you simply rush to the extremes of evangelical to atheist?
A: He is an evangelist no matter what he believes.
(3) Q: Should we all be conducting outreach – Atheistic Evangelism?
A: If it’s bad for us it’s bad for them (suggesting again that Atheism cannot stand alone and must feed and fuel itself off of Christian tactics.)
(4) Q: What is truth?
A: Truth is not a thing or morality; truth is the degree with which a statement corresponds to reality. The language of proposition must be supported by observation and evidence. Therefore Jesus cannot be truth (and yet another statement uses the foundation of Christianity for its existence).
(5) Q: Christian man came to the microphone at this point and apologized for the hatred Mr. Barker had experienced at the hand of the church and this was not indicative of the love of Jesus Christ.
A: Mr. Barker refused the apology and stated that the young man had no authority to speak for believers. (The demand for an apology carrying the weight of authority seems to be a direct contradiction to his support of the “freethinking” principle of no hierarchy. And yet here he demands the knee of some hierarchical structure to appease him. While I am on that note, how does one become a "lead Atheist" in a framework that recognizes no hierarchy?)
In summation, I felt cheated of the intellectual presentation I showed up to witness and felt more as if I had stumbled in on a locker-room pep talk for Atheists, lacking any substance but full of derision and fluff. My recommendation if you want to find material worthy of the title Atheist, is to look at Richard Dawkin’s work and not the intellectual freeloading of Dan Barker.
Friday, September 3, 2010
One Week Down
I have officially finished my first week at Denver Seminary and it was a blast!!! Now if I can just get through the next 15 weeks in one piece I'll be set. I loved every class and was very impressed by the knowledge and character of each professor. I realized after this week that the commute isn't as bad as I thought it would be. (approximately 25 min.) My greatest concern going into this week was the workload, but after carefully going over all my syllabi I am confident that with continuous work every day I will be just fine. The other looming anxiety was for Declan. I have been home with him since he was born (11 months) and I was worried about how he would do with someone else watching him. He is doing great!! God is so good! He spends the mornings while I am at class at one of my friends' house. She has an 18 month old daughter and they play great together. It is absolutely amazing how God works out the little details for us when we are following His will for our lives. I have to keep this blog short so I can get back to my reading. I think I'll write my first philosophy paper on the ineffectiveness of using too many textbooks in one class (8!!!). Joking... they're all great reads; I'm just glad I love reading, otherwise the load would be intimidating. Thank you everyone that has been praying for me this week. Please continue to lift me up in prayer as I need endurance to run this race.
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
Goodbye Summer...
Summer has always been my favorite season. I blame it on my upbringing in Brazil. I just love the sweltering heat. The approach of the end of summer loomed large this morning as Denver was blanketed in clouds and drizzle. We had a great summer though. This was Declan's first summer and he has been quite mobile. Naomi perfected her swimming which made our pool visits much more enjoyable. She was able to go on the big twisty slide, having met the prerequisite of swimming an entire link in the 'deep end'. I was so proud of her. Yesterday was Naomi's first day of second grade. I could tell when she got home that she absolutely loved her class and teacher. I hope I am able to help her maintain her love of school.
I have always loved school. I love to learn. I love to converse and dialogue with people. Amidst my slight anxiety, I am overwhelmed with excitement about starting school this Friday. Orientation Day at Denver Seminary is on Friday and my first official day of class is Monday. I feel like a child again... except I didn't get to buy new tennis shoes for PE. I'm going to try and make my old ones last until Spring since I run less in the winter.
I have several reasons for wanting to attend Denver Seminary which I haven't really mentioned to others yet but I feel I should write down. Hopefully when I look back at this I will be able to say that it met at least some of my expectations. I have wanted to pursue my Masters in Theology for quite some time now. If you had told me that ten years ago I'd have told you you're crazy. After all, I dropped out of Bible College 14 years ago, opting instead for a career in the Air Force. Funny how life sends you in circles sometimes. For a while I had been looking at various online degree programs since I am a stay-at-home mom and thought that would be the best option. But I soon realized, how much I would actually miss in studying and learning if I chose the less interactive course. And so I began to plan my life around physically attending class. I pondered moving to VA so I could study at Regent. I considered moving to CA to study at LIFE (I grew up in Foursquare and it is a denomination very close to my heart.) But I finally accepted the idea that God had placed me in Denver, and I was to be here for the next 4-5 years. So if I was to pursue a degree program it needed to be where He had me. That left me with Denver Seminary. Once I did some research and visited the campus I fell in love with it and its mission, not to mention being impressed by some of the highly reputable scholars that have come out of Denver Seminary.
At this year's Foursquare convention (I try to go whenever I can to spend time with family and see dearly loved friends) one of the speakers mentioned he wanted to see the denomination move forward in the area of ecumenical theological contribution. I thought my heart was going to burst when I heard those words. That is what I want to do! And so it is with this passion that I begin my sojourn into the pursuit of my MDiV and beyond. I know the road will be full of challenges, setbacks, revisions and the like, but I am excited to go through it all. I may not know the full extent of God's plan, but it is enough that I know He has a plan...and a hope, for my future. On that note... Goodbye Summer! Hello Fall!
My fall will definitely be interesting. Here's my list of classes:
Effective Biblical Interpretation
Engaging Early and Medieval Christianity
Introduction to New Testament Greek
Defending Christian Faith
Introduction to Christian Formation, Training and Mentoring
Introduction to Ministry in Intercultural Context
Pray for me!
I have always loved school. I love to learn. I love to converse and dialogue with people. Amidst my slight anxiety, I am overwhelmed with excitement about starting school this Friday. Orientation Day at Denver Seminary is on Friday and my first official day of class is Monday. I feel like a child again... except I didn't get to buy new tennis shoes for PE. I'm going to try and make my old ones last until Spring since I run less in the winter.
I have several reasons for wanting to attend Denver Seminary which I haven't really mentioned to others yet but I feel I should write down. Hopefully when I look back at this I will be able to say that it met at least some of my expectations. I have wanted to pursue my Masters in Theology for quite some time now. If you had told me that ten years ago I'd have told you you're crazy. After all, I dropped out of Bible College 14 years ago, opting instead for a career in the Air Force. Funny how life sends you in circles sometimes. For a while I had been looking at various online degree programs since I am a stay-at-home mom and thought that would be the best option. But I soon realized, how much I would actually miss in studying and learning if I chose the less interactive course. And so I began to plan my life around physically attending class. I pondered moving to VA so I could study at Regent. I considered moving to CA to study at LIFE (I grew up in Foursquare and it is a denomination very close to my heart.) But I finally accepted the idea that God had placed me in Denver, and I was to be here for the next 4-5 years. So if I was to pursue a degree program it needed to be where He had me. That left me with Denver Seminary. Once I did some research and visited the campus I fell in love with it and its mission, not to mention being impressed by some of the highly reputable scholars that have come out of Denver Seminary.
At this year's Foursquare convention (I try to go whenever I can to spend time with family and see dearly loved friends) one of the speakers mentioned he wanted to see the denomination move forward in the area of ecumenical theological contribution. I thought my heart was going to burst when I heard those words. That is what I want to do! And so it is with this passion that I begin my sojourn into the pursuit of my MDiV and beyond. I know the road will be full of challenges, setbacks, revisions and the like, but I am excited to go through it all. I may not know the full extent of God's plan, but it is enough that I know He has a plan...and a hope, for my future. On that note... Goodbye Summer! Hello Fall!
My fall will definitely be interesting. Here's my list of classes:
Effective Biblical Interpretation
Engaging Early and Medieval Christianity
Introduction to New Testament Greek
Defending Christian Faith
Introduction to Christian Formation, Training and Mentoring
Introduction to Ministry in Intercultural Context
Pray for me!
Monday, August 16, 2010
Understanding Your Wife's Sexual Needs
Physiological Design
As much as we would like to transcend the lines of gender with a sense of sameness in our definition of equality, the constraints of the physical realm do not allow us to do so. While we were designed to be equal that design will never absolve the differences between man and woman. And so somehow we must learn from and give to each other in light of our differences. I read a fair amount of writing on the topic of sexuality and for the most part within the Evangelical world there seems to be an overwhelming preoccupation with conveying the needs of male sexuality and sloughing off any real attempt to address the issue of woman’s sexuality and her needs. I believe most of this attitude is due to a misunderstanding that because a woman’s sex drive as defined by the production of testosterone is normally less than a man’s, that this means we have fewer sexual needs, but that is not so. Our needs are simply different. Since God created both of these needs within mankind and designed them to work as one then we need to make an attempt to do just that.
I would like to begin this explanation at a very base level to identify some of the physiological differences alone between male and female and how this impacts sexuality. The physical design of sexual intercourse in any species is for reproduction, to propagate the species. In this context alone we can see some of what separates male from female. Where the male can contribute to the reproductive process at any time, the female cannot and can only contribute once a month (for humans) within a very short window of opportunity. This alone affects our drives. While men may seem ready and willing at any and every occasion, women experience the fluctuation in hormones and extreme drive to reproduce only within this window. This does not include outside contributing factors but is based on hormonal drive alone.
Women undergo ovulation every month and at the end of the cycle, if fertilization has not occurred the body rids itself of the unused egg. This process involves an entirely different set of hormones and reactions than those involving reproduction. The hormonal state of the woman’s body at this point in time cries out in grief and a need for solitude as she pushes away from those around her and enters a stage of grief. All women experience this to varying degrees. While this does not signify a legitimate mental or emotional desire or need to bear children it is a physical reality of what the body alone is designed to do.
If upon entering the ovulation stage, fertilization does occur this creates an all new set of responses in the female body. For the first trimester (provided the fluctuations of hormones do not create too much sickness) the woman’s hormonal state is heightened at all levels. There is an increase in the woman’s sex drive at this point in time and lasts a fair amount into the second trimester. The development of the child’s gonads and which hormones are subsequently required for their maturity has an impact on the sexual drive of the woman. But for the most part, a woman’s body really starts to kick into overdrive at this point in time and begins to focus all effort (mental, emotional, and physical) into the development of the child. At this point in time you will also notice the external phenomenon known as ‘nesting’. ‘Nesting’ throws the woman into preparation mode and will refocus the drive from her hormones from husband to child.
Labor and delivery is the most physically intensive portion of the childbearing process. The female body works, and works very hard, undergoing excruciating pain sometimes to the detriment and loss of life, in order to give birth. But her labor and service to child does not end there. The physical demand on mind and body continue as the mother and infant form bonds and nurture one another. The nurturing process, mainly the breastfeeding, is highly demanding on a woman’s body and for some can completely deplete them of any desire or need for extra physical affections. Many women opt not to breastfeed their children for extensive periods of time because of the level of demand and strain it places on a woman’s body. (Each woman is different and so I am not advocating for or against that practice.) I personally experienced both extremes as I was not able to breastfeed my daughter due to special dietary needs but committed fully to breastfeed my son. And so I can speak to both extremes. In each situation breastfeeding had an impact on the sex drive. This is also evidenced by the fact that most women do not regain their reproductive cycle until at least a year into breastfeeding. So one may sufficiently deduce from this, that breastfeeding has a definite impact on the hormonal state, not to mention the sex drive of a woman.
By this time, a woman has just spent close to two years mentally, emotionally and physically focused entirely on the child and meeting his/her each and every need almost entirely with her body. The tremendous demands placed on our bodies necessitate rest. Please keep in mind that this entire time, throughout all the hormonal changes in the female body, the male body has remained unchanged as has his sex drive. Since my view of things incorporates not only the physiological aspects but also my faith, I defer to what Scripture has to say on the matter. It may say more than we realize.
What the Bible says (New Testament)
“In this same way, husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself.” Eph 5:28. I concur wholeheartedly with this verse but believe our understanding of it is skewed if we do not understand that the needs of a husband’s body are different from the needs of a wife’s body. So the key to practicing this verse is to know the needs of your wife’s body. If you can meet that need, then the law of cause and effect will (in theory) take care of your own need.
“The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. The wife’s body does not belong to her alone but also to her husband. In the same way, the husband’s body does not belong to him alone but also to this wife. Do not deprive each other except by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control. I say this as a concession, not as a command. I wish that all men were as I am… but if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.” 1 Cor. 7:3-8. As I said at the beginning of this article, the marital needs of the husband have been well articulated but the marital needs of the wife often go unexplored. This passage and in particular the first verse is often invoked with the misunderstanding that meeting the wife’s marital need means having sexual relations with her. While that may meet a level of need for her it does not meet the entirety of the design of her body.
“Therefore, I urge you, brothers, in view of God’s mercy, to offer your bodies as living sacrifices, holy and pleasing to God – this is your spiritual act of worship.” Romans 12:1 I believe this verse to be key in its expression of the ultimate goal of the body. So what we must ask is this: “Does the use of my wife’s body allow enough space for her to come before God and present herself as a living sacrifice or do I deplete her mentally, emotionally, and physically to the point that she has no spiritual fervor to offer God?” While we do indeed have obligations to one another as husband and wife, we also have an obligation to help each other in our spiritual walk with God. Often when applying any New Testament scripture we omit the context and history wrapped up in the cultural conditions best understood by studying the Old Testament. And so I return to the Old Testament before expounding further on the New Testament.
What the Bible says (Old Testament)
“To the woman he said, “I will greatly increase your pains in childbearing; with pain you will give birth to children. Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you.” Genesis 3:16 What we may gather and infer from this phrasing is that pain and hard work has always been part of childbearing but that the fall of man led to an increase in this pain. What we may also understand is that one of the consequences of the fall was an unhealthy desire for man whether it is to please him, pursue his affirmation or attempt to wield more power than him. And lastly we may deduce that the man’s rule over woman instead of an equal balance in the meeting of minds and needs was a consequence of our disobedience. But in spite of the curses there is evidence that God greatly cared for and loved woman and went to great lengths to make provisions for her needs mentally, emotionally and physically.
One of the first occasions we see of God’s care over woman is in the story of Abraham and Sarah. When Abraham put Sarah at risk by placing her in a situation to sin against God, her own body, Abraham, and Abimelech, God intervened to protect her from having to bear that burden. (Gen 20:1-18). In Genesis chapter 38 God comes to the aid of Tamar as she fulfilled cultural tradition in an attempt to bear children and was abused and misused sexually by the men in her husband’s family. I bring these particular stories to the front because I believe it to be a common misconception that God does not care for the sexual needs of women and allows for husbands to treat them however they see fit in order to meet their own sexual needs. There are many more stories of God’s protection and defense over women despite the cultural tradition of their subservience and less than humane treatment.
When it comes to sexual provisions for women and understanding the female body’s need for rest we may find much on the topic in the Law given to Moses for the care of God’s people. “When a woman has her regular flow of blood, the impurity of her monthly period will last seven days, and anyone who touches her will be unclean till evening…When she is cleansed from her discharge she must count off seven days, and after that she will be ceremonially clean.” This provides an entirety of two weeks rest for the female body free of any sexual obligations or demands as the man is also unclean if he touches her during this time. In addition to this provision there are also the requirements involved with sexual secretions. “When any man has a bodily discharge, the discharge is unclean…and he will be unclean till evening.” I bring this passage up because it allows us to understand the commitment and foreknowledge involved in planning out and being conscious of each other’s time and duties before having sexual relations. (Leviticus 15)
Please keep in mind that I am not citing these laws to suggest that we need to follow them in some way, or attempt to place some sort of legalistic aura around the sexual relationship. I am citing the laws so that we may gather insight on what God designed for healthy rest and sexual relations. So far in my study of the Law and its provisions I can find no case where God did not have the best interests of the people in mind or that in our present day we have not found scientific evidence to support. God’s requirement for Sabbath rest at least one in seven days is supported by medical professionals. God’s requirement for agricultural Sabbath is supported by farmers today and our practice of crop rotation. For evidence of what happens when we do not observe the rest of the land, one may simply study the dustbowl phenomenon of the late 1800’s and early 1900’s. We over seeded the land, gave her no rest and she dried out, rose up against us and destroyed us. Sound familiar? Our intentions were good; we wanted more bang for our buck. But there were consequences to that.
Lastly, in direct support of medical advice today for the postpartum care of women, the Law suggests precisely what medical professionals suggest for the care of women and their children. “A woman who becomes pregnant and gives birth to a son will be ceremonially unclean for seven days…then the woman must wait thirty three days to be purified from her bleeding (twice as long for daughters).” (Leviticus 12) That is a total of 42 days (one extra day is incorporated for the eighth day of circumcision). That is six weeks, which is exactly the time frame doctors prescribe and at which point the woman is advised to undergo her postpartum checkup and is cleared for safe sexual activity. I believe the extra time constraints for daughters are to help and develop the bond between mother and daughter, which is more difficult to maintain than between mother and son. (But the Oedipus complex is an entirely different blog altogether – no married woman can deny the resiliency of the bond between mother and son which if not properly cut, can last well into adulthood whereas the bond between mother and daughter is a constant struggle throughout life).
My point in citing the various laws of the Old Testament, is that the admonitions of the New Testament were given in light of the provisions that people were accustomed to under the Law. Speaking plainly, it was simple practice to allow the female body two weeks of rest leaving the two remaining weeks available for sexual activity with her husband. While we are not 'under the law' we learn much of God's protection for His people by studying His ways. By observing some of the other laws on rest we see that there is factual scientific support for their benefit. God designed the female body to meet childbearing, nutritional, comfort, and sexual needs. But in order to meet all those needs, God also made provisions for her rest. Rest is essential to understanding and meeting a wife's sexual needs.
Cultural Handicaps
According to a recent series of articles published by Focus on the Family on Understanding the Husband’s Sexual Needs the following was stated: “No doubt, our sexually explicit culture plays into the prominence of sex on a man's mind. He can't open the newspaper, turn on the television, surf the Net, or walk into a mall without being reminded of sexual desire.” While this is a reality of our culture it is an assault to both male and female sexuality. I am sure we have all been exposed at one time or another to the schoolyard bully mentality where an individual transfers inappropriately, his struggles from work or home onto other individuals outside of his immediate circle of influence. While we understand his behavior and are sympathetic to his plight we also understand that his venue of venting is unhealthy and a violation of others’ boundaries. The same can be said of bringing outside sexual stimulation home, presenting it as a legitimate need meant to be met by the wife. It was not the wife’s flesh that created the stimulation therefore it is an unrealistic expectation that her body should meet the need.
While women cannot always discern the nature of stimulation beforehand we are innately acute at discerning the abuse of our bodies after the fact. The misappropriation of sexual stimulation will eventually generate resentment in a woman as her body is overtaxed by demands she is not hormonally capable of matching or meeting. We can meet the sexual need but we cannot match the enthusiasm desired of us often resulting in the “cold fish” syndrome. Too often this occurs within the Church accompanied by an invocation of Scripture pertaining to the wife meeting the husband’s sexual needs. But I propose this is a direct violation of God’s command to husband and wife to become and function as one flesh. So the question presents itself of how to go about creating a hormonal atmosphere conducive to meeting the male sex drive.
Mental, Emotional, and Physical Ties
While many biblical scholars agree that the cultural traditions of the first century had incredible impact on certain admonitions for husbands taking responsibility for the wife’s education, in our day and age we are educated outside of the home and men and women have access to the same levels of education. While I see this as a positive exemplification of equality it may remove a sense of need to “match minds” in the marital relationship and to mentally guide and sharpen one another. The impact this has on a woman’s sexuality is monumental as for many women gaining satisfaction during sexual intercourse is a battle won or lost on the mental level. It is quite the opposite for men, where his mental capacity is often won or lost at the sexual level.
The emotional realm is a much dreaded topic for men but let me appease your anxiety by saying that women do not expect men to match their emotions; women expect men to meet their emotions. Meeting the emotions is not an overwhelming task if men are firstly meeting a woman’s mind. Win her mind, and he will inevitably win her emotions or at the very least have a level of insight into her emotions. Once the emotions are tapped into we arrive at the physical responses felt by a woman.
Since the physical response of a woman is the primary complaint made by most men then this is the ultimate goal being pursued. A recent article in Parenting Magazine on The Power of Love explained the following in relation to the mother/child bond and the need to frequently kiss your baby: “Pathogens on a baby’s skin are carried from the mother’s lips into her system, and she produces made-to-order antibodies that boost his (the child’s) immunity.” The catch is, women do not produce the antibodies immediately but over the course of a few days our bodies have the correct formula created. I see no reason why the same could not be said of a woman’s body producing a hormonal response to the needs of her husband over time. Since one of the chief demands by men is that women take some sexual initiative then they must wait for our hormones to catch up with their physical need. Kiss your wives, hold your wives, provide the skin to skin contact that wives need to produce the physiological response over time without the immediate demand for sexual gratification and she will (in theory) be able to take the initiative the husband desires. Unfortunately our cultural placation to immediate gratification darkens the need to cultivate the sexual relationship in patience. But perhaps God’s design of our bodies was meant to teach us far more about life’s principles than we give Him credit for. After all, I cannot find or cite a single biblical principle that hinges on the practice of immediate gratification.
The Military Wife
Since being a military wife is a reality I am familiar with after being married to an active duty member for ten years, and also a present reality for many of the women I have had the privilege of networking with, I feel the need to address briefly the difference in her needs. Military wives are faced with the very real experience of long term separation during deployments. We count on the husband’s ability to refrain from sexual activity while apart from us. Sometimes these separations can last for years. When we are presented with articles and teachings portraying the physical needs of our husbands that must be met and cannot be foregone for any extensive period of time, we cringe and scoff. Our marital security depends on the strength, self-control, and integrity of his character while we are apart and his ability to deny those physical needs. For many men and women, the most effective means of exercising self control in one’s sexuality while separated is a mental, conscious severance of the sexual desires. Since we are not light switches that can turn on and off, this is a discipline that we develop over time and also takes time to recover from afterwards.
There are struggles associated with reinstating the sexual relationship upon a soldiers’ homecoming. War and separation change men and women. It is unrealistic to think that a husband and wife have not undergone changes while apart and will not need time to realign on both a mental and emotional level before being able to truly connect at the physical level. But there are also biblical provisions for this. “All of you who have killed anyone or touched anyone who was killed must stay outside the camp seven days. On the third and seventh days you must purify yourselves and your captives.” (Numbers 31:19) In essence, war has no place in the home and time is needed to wind down from the rigors of combat. Unfortunately, due to the media and levels of violence in our entertainment, this degree of separation between home life and war is worn thin in our society and often the brutal and aggressive tendencies are brought into the home as well as to the marriage bed. Fortunately the military is now taking more action in helping to prevent the aggressive carryover from war and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) through periods of recovery before soldiers are sent home (yet another proof that God knows best when it comes to the mental, emotional and physical stability of His people).
Spiritual Lessons Derived from Female Sexuality
While women do indeed desire to meet their husband’s sexual needs it is impossible for us to meet them on his time table and on the basis of immediate gratification without jeopardizing our identity and femininity. Since this is the way God designed us then we must ask ourselves what we are to learn from this. In my role as a wife, I learn elements of kindness, goodness, gentleness, peace and love by meeting the needs of my husband even when I may not feel like it. In return, a husband can learn elements of patience, joy, self-control, and meekness through meeting his wife’s needs when he may not want to. Together we learn essential aspects of sacrifice and rest. We really do help each other to develop Christ-like virtues through our sexuality and its expression as God designed us.
Meeting of the Minds (Needs)
A woman’s body is created and designed to be able to meet the sexual needs of her husband in proportion to the amount of rest her body is allowed. Try sitting down with your wife and discussing what she needs for rest and what qualifies as rest for her. It may be something as small as sending her to the spa on occasion, giving her a massage, taking the kids out of the home for a day, helping with some random chores or something as big as taking a full blown vacation. Don’t take anything for granted. I used to assume that Sunday qualified as my day of rest until I realized that Sundays were anything but restful in an effort to get everyone ready and out the door for Church and preparing for school on Mondays. While I still enjoy the fellowship of Church on Sundays, my personal Sabbath is Saturday when I have no immediate obligations to meet and can truly just relax.
If your wife is not getting a day of rest each week where she is truly resting, then reorganize your schedules so that you are both getting a full day to yourselves. Talk often as needs change over time. While routine is good, it can be a marital killer when needs change and our schedules are not adjusted to reflect those changes.
Balancing the Sexual Desires
Jesus sums up all God’s commandments in this one statement, “Love God, and love others.” If we focus our efforts on our spouse and his or her needs instead of focusing on our own, we will find the true fulfillment Scripture promises when we live our lives based on God’s principles. I think the greatest breakdown in the area of sexuality happens when we assume that our partner’s needs should mirror our own. They never will.
This has been an incredibly difficult article for me to write and I truly wanted to give up at several points while writing. I do not know entirely why I felt so driven to pen this, but I hope it somehow provides insight for men into the intricacy that is their wife and a level of comfort to wives in that whatever your struggles may be, you are not alone. Keep in mind that I am only one woman amongst billions and therefore my insights and experience can never encompass the many diverse needs of all women.
As much as we would like to transcend the lines of gender with a sense of sameness in our definition of equality, the constraints of the physical realm do not allow us to do so. While we were designed to be equal that design will never absolve the differences between man and woman. And so somehow we must learn from and give to each other in light of our differences. I read a fair amount of writing on the topic of sexuality and for the most part within the Evangelical world there seems to be an overwhelming preoccupation with conveying the needs of male sexuality and sloughing off any real attempt to address the issue of woman’s sexuality and her needs. I believe most of this attitude is due to a misunderstanding that because a woman’s sex drive as defined by the production of testosterone is normally less than a man’s, that this means we have fewer sexual needs, but that is not so. Our needs are simply different. Since God created both of these needs within mankind and designed them to work as one then we need to make an attempt to do just that.
I would like to begin this explanation at a very base level to identify some of the physiological differences alone between male and female and how this impacts sexuality. The physical design of sexual intercourse in any species is for reproduction, to propagate the species. In this context alone we can see some of what separates male from female. Where the male can contribute to the reproductive process at any time, the female cannot and can only contribute once a month (for humans) within a very short window of opportunity. This alone affects our drives. While men may seem ready and willing at any and every occasion, women experience the fluctuation in hormones and extreme drive to reproduce only within this window. This does not include outside contributing factors but is based on hormonal drive alone.
Women undergo ovulation every month and at the end of the cycle, if fertilization has not occurred the body rids itself of the unused egg. This process involves an entirely different set of hormones and reactions than those involving reproduction. The hormonal state of the woman’s body at this point in time cries out in grief and a need for solitude as she pushes away from those around her and enters a stage of grief. All women experience this to varying degrees. While this does not signify a legitimate mental or emotional desire or need to bear children it is a physical reality of what the body alone is designed to do.
If upon entering the ovulation stage, fertilization does occur this creates an all new set of responses in the female body. For the first trimester (provided the fluctuations of hormones do not create too much sickness) the woman’s hormonal state is heightened at all levels. There is an increase in the woman’s sex drive at this point in time and lasts a fair amount into the second trimester. The development of the child’s gonads and which hormones are subsequently required for their maturity has an impact on the sexual drive of the woman. But for the most part, a woman’s body really starts to kick into overdrive at this point in time and begins to focus all effort (mental, emotional, and physical) into the development of the child. At this point in time you will also notice the external phenomenon known as ‘nesting’. ‘Nesting’ throws the woman into preparation mode and will refocus the drive from her hormones from husband to child.
Labor and delivery is the most physically intensive portion of the childbearing process. The female body works, and works very hard, undergoing excruciating pain sometimes to the detriment and loss of life, in order to give birth. But her labor and service to child does not end there. The physical demand on mind and body continue as the mother and infant form bonds and nurture one another. The nurturing process, mainly the breastfeeding, is highly demanding on a woman’s body and for some can completely deplete them of any desire or need for extra physical affections. Many women opt not to breastfeed their children for extensive periods of time because of the level of demand and strain it places on a woman’s body. (Each woman is different and so I am not advocating for or against that practice.) I personally experienced both extremes as I was not able to breastfeed my daughter due to special dietary needs but committed fully to breastfeed my son. And so I can speak to both extremes. In each situation breastfeeding had an impact on the sex drive. This is also evidenced by the fact that most women do not regain their reproductive cycle until at least a year into breastfeeding. So one may sufficiently deduce from this, that breastfeeding has a definite impact on the hormonal state, not to mention the sex drive of a woman.
By this time, a woman has just spent close to two years mentally, emotionally and physically focused entirely on the child and meeting his/her each and every need almost entirely with her body. The tremendous demands placed on our bodies necessitate rest. Please keep in mind that this entire time, throughout all the hormonal changes in the female body, the male body has remained unchanged as has his sex drive. Since my view of things incorporates not only the physiological aspects but also my faith, I defer to what Scripture has to say on the matter. It may say more than we realize.
What the Bible says (New Testament)
“In this same way, husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself.” Eph 5:28. I concur wholeheartedly with this verse but believe our understanding of it is skewed if we do not understand that the needs of a husband’s body are different from the needs of a wife’s body. So the key to practicing this verse is to know the needs of your wife’s body. If you can meet that need, then the law of cause and effect will (in theory) take care of your own need.
“The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. The wife’s body does not belong to her alone but also to her husband. In the same way, the husband’s body does not belong to him alone but also to this wife. Do not deprive each other except by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control. I say this as a concession, not as a command. I wish that all men were as I am… but if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.” 1 Cor. 7:3-8. As I said at the beginning of this article, the marital needs of the husband have been well articulated but the marital needs of the wife often go unexplored. This passage and in particular the first verse is often invoked with the misunderstanding that meeting the wife’s marital need means having sexual relations with her. While that may meet a level of need for her it does not meet the entirety of the design of her body.
“Therefore, I urge you, brothers, in view of God’s mercy, to offer your bodies as living sacrifices, holy and pleasing to God – this is your spiritual act of worship.” Romans 12:1 I believe this verse to be key in its expression of the ultimate goal of the body. So what we must ask is this: “Does the use of my wife’s body allow enough space for her to come before God and present herself as a living sacrifice or do I deplete her mentally, emotionally, and physically to the point that she has no spiritual fervor to offer God?” While we do indeed have obligations to one another as husband and wife, we also have an obligation to help each other in our spiritual walk with God. Often when applying any New Testament scripture we omit the context and history wrapped up in the cultural conditions best understood by studying the Old Testament. And so I return to the Old Testament before expounding further on the New Testament.
What the Bible says (Old Testament)
“To the woman he said, “I will greatly increase your pains in childbearing; with pain you will give birth to children. Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you.” Genesis 3:16 What we may gather and infer from this phrasing is that pain and hard work has always been part of childbearing but that the fall of man led to an increase in this pain. What we may also understand is that one of the consequences of the fall was an unhealthy desire for man whether it is to please him, pursue his affirmation or attempt to wield more power than him. And lastly we may deduce that the man’s rule over woman instead of an equal balance in the meeting of minds and needs was a consequence of our disobedience. But in spite of the curses there is evidence that God greatly cared for and loved woman and went to great lengths to make provisions for her needs mentally, emotionally and physically.
One of the first occasions we see of God’s care over woman is in the story of Abraham and Sarah. When Abraham put Sarah at risk by placing her in a situation to sin against God, her own body, Abraham, and Abimelech, God intervened to protect her from having to bear that burden. (Gen 20:1-18). In Genesis chapter 38 God comes to the aid of Tamar as she fulfilled cultural tradition in an attempt to bear children and was abused and misused sexually by the men in her husband’s family. I bring these particular stories to the front because I believe it to be a common misconception that God does not care for the sexual needs of women and allows for husbands to treat them however they see fit in order to meet their own sexual needs. There are many more stories of God’s protection and defense over women despite the cultural tradition of their subservience and less than humane treatment.
When it comes to sexual provisions for women and understanding the female body’s need for rest we may find much on the topic in the Law given to Moses for the care of God’s people. “When a woman has her regular flow of blood, the impurity of her monthly period will last seven days, and anyone who touches her will be unclean till evening…When she is cleansed from her discharge she must count off seven days, and after that she will be ceremonially clean.” This provides an entirety of two weeks rest for the female body free of any sexual obligations or demands as the man is also unclean if he touches her during this time. In addition to this provision there are also the requirements involved with sexual secretions. “When any man has a bodily discharge, the discharge is unclean…and he will be unclean till evening.” I bring this passage up because it allows us to understand the commitment and foreknowledge involved in planning out and being conscious of each other’s time and duties before having sexual relations. (Leviticus 15)
Please keep in mind that I am not citing these laws to suggest that we need to follow them in some way, or attempt to place some sort of legalistic aura around the sexual relationship. I am citing the laws so that we may gather insight on what God designed for healthy rest and sexual relations. So far in my study of the Law and its provisions I can find no case where God did not have the best interests of the people in mind or that in our present day we have not found scientific evidence to support. God’s requirement for Sabbath rest at least one in seven days is supported by medical professionals. God’s requirement for agricultural Sabbath is supported by farmers today and our practice of crop rotation. For evidence of what happens when we do not observe the rest of the land, one may simply study the dustbowl phenomenon of the late 1800’s and early 1900’s. We over seeded the land, gave her no rest and she dried out, rose up against us and destroyed us. Sound familiar? Our intentions were good; we wanted more bang for our buck. But there were consequences to that.
Lastly, in direct support of medical advice today for the postpartum care of women, the Law suggests precisely what medical professionals suggest for the care of women and their children. “A woman who becomes pregnant and gives birth to a son will be ceremonially unclean for seven days…then the woman must wait thirty three days to be purified from her bleeding (twice as long for daughters).” (Leviticus 12) That is a total of 42 days (one extra day is incorporated for the eighth day of circumcision). That is six weeks, which is exactly the time frame doctors prescribe and at which point the woman is advised to undergo her postpartum checkup and is cleared for safe sexual activity. I believe the extra time constraints for daughters are to help and develop the bond between mother and daughter, which is more difficult to maintain than between mother and son. (But the Oedipus complex is an entirely different blog altogether – no married woman can deny the resiliency of the bond between mother and son which if not properly cut, can last well into adulthood whereas the bond between mother and daughter is a constant struggle throughout life).
My point in citing the various laws of the Old Testament, is that the admonitions of the New Testament were given in light of the provisions that people were accustomed to under the Law. Speaking plainly, it was simple practice to allow the female body two weeks of rest leaving the two remaining weeks available for sexual activity with her husband. While we are not 'under the law' we learn much of God's protection for His people by studying His ways. By observing some of the other laws on rest we see that there is factual scientific support for their benefit. God designed the female body to meet childbearing, nutritional, comfort, and sexual needs. But in order to meet all those needs, God also made provisions for her rest. Rest is essential to understanding and meeting a wife's sexual needs.
Cultural Handicaps
According to a recent series of articles published by Focus on the Family on Understanding the Husband’s Sexual Needs the following was stated: “No doubt, our sexually explicit culture plays into the prominence of sex on a man's mind. He can't open the newspaper, turn on the television, surf the Net, or walk into a mall without being reminded of sexual desire.” While this is a reality of our culture it is an assault to both male and female sexuality. I am sure we have all been exposed at one time or another to the schoolyard bully mentality where an individual transfers inappropriately, his struggles from work or home onto other individuals outside of his immediate circle of influence. While we understand his behavior and are sympathetic to his plight we also understand that his venue of venting is unhealthy and a violation of others’ boundaries. The same can be said of bringing outside sexual stimulation home, presenting it as a legitimate need meant to be met by the wife. It was not the wife’s flesh that created the stimulation therefore it is an unrealistic expectation that her body should meet the need.
While women cannot always discern the nature of stimulation beforehand we are innately acute at discerning the abuse of our bodies after the fact. The misappropriation of sexual stimulation will eventually generate resentment in a woman as her body is overtaxed by demands she is not hormonally capable of matching or meeting. We can meet the sexual need but we cannot match the enthusiasm desired of us often resulting in the “cold fish” syndrome. Too often this occurs within the Church accompanied by an invocation of Scripture pertaining to the wife meeting the husband’s sexual needs. But I propose this is a direct violation of God’s command to husband and wife to become and function as one flesh. So the question presents itself of how to go about creating a hormonal atmosphere conducive to meeting the male sex drive.
Mental, Emotional, and Physical Ties
While many biblical scholars agree that the cultural traditions of the first century had incredible impact on certain admonitions for husbands taking responsibility for the wife’s education, in our day and age we are educated outside of the home and men and women have access to the same levels of education. While I see this as a positive exemplification of equality it may remove a sense of need to “match minds” in the marital relationship and to mentally guide and sharpen one another. The impact this has on a woman’s sexuality is monumental as for many women gaining satisfaction during sexual intercourse is a battle won or lost on the mental level. It is quite the opposite for men, where his mental capacity is often won or lost at the sexual level.
The emotional realm is a much dreaded topic for men but let me appease your anxiety by saying that women do not expect men to match their emotions; women expect men to meet their emotions. Meeting the emotions is not an overwhelming task if men are firstly meeting a woman’s mind. Win her mind, and he will inevitably win her emotions or at the very least have a level of insight into her emotions. Once the emotions are tapped into we arrive at the physical responses felt by a woman.
Since the physical response of a woman is the primary complaint made by most men then this is the ultimate goal being pursued. A recent article in Parenting Magazine on The Power of Love explained the following in relation to the mother/child bond and the need to frequently kiss your baby: “Pathogens on a baby’s skin are carried from the mother’s lips into her system, and she produces made-to-order antibodies that boost his (the child’s) immunity.” The catch is, women do not produce the antibodies immediately but over the course of a few days our bodies have the correct formula created. I see no reason why the same could not be said of a woman’s body producing a hormonal response to the needs of her husband over time. Since one of the chief demands by men is that women take some sexual initiative then they must wait for our hormones to catch up with their physical need. Kiss your wives, hold your wives, provide the skin to skin contact that wives need to produce the physiological response over time without the immediate demand for sexual gratification and she will (in theory) be able to take the initiative the husband desires. Unfortunately our cultural placation to immediate gratification darkens the need to cultivate the sexual relationship in patience. But perhaps God’s design of our bodies was meant to teach us far more about life’s principles than we give Him credit for. After all, I cannot find or cite a single biblical principle that hinges on the practice of immediate gratification.
The Military Wife
Since being a military wife is a reality I am familiar with after being married to an active duty member for ten years, and also a present reality for many of the women I have had the privilege of networking with, I feel the need to address briefly the difference in her needs. Military wives are faced with the very real experience of long term separation during deployments. We count on the husband’s ability to refrain from sexual activity while apart from us. Sometimes these separations can last for years. When we are presented with articles and teachings portraying the physical needs of our husbands that must be met and cannot be foregone for any extensive period of time, we cringe and scoff. Our marital security depends on the strength, self-control, and integrity of his character while we are apart and his ability to deny those physical needs. For many men and women, the most effective means of exercising self control in one’s sexuality while separated is a mental, conscious severance of the sexual desires. Since we are not light switches that can turn on and off, this is a discipline that we develop over time and also takes time to recover from afterwards.
There are struggles associated with reinstating the sexual relationship upon a soldiers’ homecoming. War and separation change men and women. It is unrealistic to think that a husband and wife have not undergone changes while apart and will not need time to realign on both a mental and emotional level before being able to truly connect at the physical level. But there are also biblical provisions for this. “All of you who have killed anyone or touched anyone who was killed must stay outside the camp seven days. On the third and seventh days you must purify yourselves and your captives.” (Numbers 31:19) In essence, war has no place in the home and time is needed to wind down from the rigors of combat. Unfortunately, due to the media and levels of violence in our entertainment, this degree of separation between home life and war is worn thin in our society and often the brutal and aggressive tendencies are brought into the home as well as to the marriage bed. Fortunately the military is now taking more action in helping to prevent the aggressive carryover from war and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) through periods of recovery before soldiers are sent home (yet another proof that God knows best when it comes to the mental, emotional and physical stability of His people).
Spiritual Lessons Derived from Female Sexuality
While women do indeed desire to meet their husband’s sexual needs it is impossible for us to meet them on his time table and on the basis of immediate gratification without jeopardizing our identity and femininity. Since this is the way God designed us then we must ask ourselves what we are to learn from this. In my role as a wife, I learn elements of kindness, goodness, gentleness, peace and love by meeting the needs of my husband even when I may not feel like it. In return, a husband can learn elements of patience, joy, self-control, and meekness through meeting his wife’s needs when he may not want to. Together we learn essential aspects of sacrifice and rest. We really do help each other to develop Christ-like virtues through our sexuality and its expression as God designed us.
Meeting of the Minds (Needs)
A woman’s body is created and designed to be able to meet the sexual needs of her husband in proportion to the amount of rest her body is allowed. Try sitting down with your wife and discussing what she needs for rest and what qualifies as rest for her. It may be something as small as sending her to the spa on occasion, giving her a massage, taking the kids out of the home for a day, helping with some random chores or something as big as taking a full blown vacation. Don’t take anything for granted. I used to assume that Sunday qualified as my day of rest until I realized that Sundays were anything but restful in an effort to get everyone ready and out the door for Church and preparing for school on Mondays. While I still enjoy the fellowship of Church on Sundays, my personal Sabbath is Saturday when I have no immediate obligations to meet and can truly just relax.
If your wife is not getting a day of rest each week where she is truly resting, then reorganize your schedules so that you are both getting a full day to yourselves. Talk often as needs change over time. While routine is good, it can be a marital killer when needs change and our schedules are not adjusted to reflect those changes.
Balancing the Sexual Desires
Jesus sums up all God’s commandments in this one statement, “Love God, and love others.” If we focus our efforts on our spouse and his or her needs instead of focusing on our own, we will find the true fulfillment Scripture promises when we live our lives based on God’s principles. I think the greatest breakdown in the area of sexuality happens when we assume that our partner’s needs should mirror our own. They never will.
This has been an incredibly difficult article for me to write and I truly wanted to give up at several points while writing. I do not know entirely why I felt so driven to pen this, but I hope it somehow provides insight for men into the intricacy that is their wife and a level of comfort to wives in that whatever your struggles may be, you are not alone. Keep in mind that I am only one woman amongst billions and therefore my insights and experience can never encompass the many diverse needs of all women.
Monday, August 9, 2010
The Complainer
“Do everything without complaining or arguing.” Philippians 2:14
I find it rather ironic that I am writing a blog on this. But hopefully by addressing my concerns about the complainer, I will be able to differentiate in the mind of the reader the difference between constructive rebuke and outright impotent complaint.
I think it will be helpful to start off with a little word study on what 'complaining' really means in this context. The Greek word used in this verse is more specifically, ‘murmuring’. A murmur is one of three things: 1) a low, indistinct, continuous sound; 2) an indistinct, whispered, or confidential complaint; or 3) an abnormal sound, usually emanating from the heart that sometimes indicates a diseased condition. I am actually going to use all three definitions to better understand the meaning of this verse and the many implications behind this person we are going to refer to quite simply as ‘the complainer’.
The first portion of the definition, ‘a low, indistinct, continuous sound’, brings to mind an annoyance of some sort, whether it be a dripping faucet, a buzzing, or perhaps a quiet hiss of static. At any rate, what we can assume from these occurrences is that something is amiss and needs to be put right – a tightening of a valve, the riddance of a pest, or frequency adjustment. But oddly enough the actual adjustment needs to happen at the source of the complaint not at its recipient. If I am the hearer of these complaints, simply plugging my ears or leaving the room is not going to solve the situation, it simply prolongs the symptoms and in some cases can lend to catastrophic consequences. What I learn from this definition is that complaint all by itself is a sign that something is wrong at the source – with the one complaining.
The second definition, ‘an indistinct, whispered, or confidential complaint’ attacks the articulation and productivity of the complaint. One of the key components of communication is articulation. It is important to be able to convey a comprehensive concern to others if we ever expect a change to occur or action to be taken. The ‘whispered or confidential’ aspect of the definition, while having its place in seeking out counsel (counsel meaning you are procuring resolution and forward movement on an issue) does not have a place in the context of idle gossip. The difference between counsel and gossip is that counsel is meant to resolve issues whereas gossip is impotent and simply promotes discontentment and negativity.
The third definition, ‘an abnormal sound, usually emanating from the heart that sometimes indicates a diseased condition’ is the most profound of definitions when applied to the complainer. A murmur or complaint in this context can quite literally affect the entire performance of the body and incapacitate its growth, circulation, and effectiveness. Within the body of Christ this is a serious concern and one that should not be taken lightly.
There is an extreme difference between issuing a complaint and expressing a concern. A complaint has no fruitfulness, offers no solutions, creates discord and attacks the integrity of the body. An expressed concern, however, places expectations of change, offers progressive solutions, and promotes the well being and healthy functioning of the body.
I am exposed to complaints on a daily basis with my children. They have legitimate needs that must be met but often they cannot properly express those needs or articulate their concerns. My son, who is 10 months old resorts to fussing and crying. My daughter, who is 7 yrs old, is much better at expressing her needs and displaying healthy responses. My son’s needs are no less important than my daughter’s but his level of physical maturity inhibits him from properly conveying those needs to me in a manner that will generate immediate results. Much time and effort is wasted in an attempt to discern the appropriate need to meet. The same can be said of our spiritual maturity. When we complain, whimpering and whining about our present dissatisfaction without offering solutions, speaking coherently, or promoting the health of the body we display spiritual immaturity. Paul never meant to say that we must not express ourselves, our needs or our concerns. He was simply attacking the cowardice of impotent expression which manifests as complaints, leaving the believer devoid of growth which in turn stifles and plagues the body.
So the next time you think of issuing a complaint, try accompanying it with a productive solution, better articulation, and a sincere display of compassion for the well being of others. By doing this you will transform that complaint into a legitimate need worthy to be addressed and met; a need that when met will stimulate growth and flourish, creating fruitfulness and begetting life to everyone around.
I find it rather ironic that I am writing a blog on this. But hopefully by addressing my concerns about the complainer, I will be able to differentiate in the mind of the reader the difference between constructive rebuke and outright impotent complaint.
I think it will be helpful to start off with a little word study on what 'complaining' really means in this context. The Greek word used in this verse is more specifically, ‘murmuring’. A murmur is one of three things: 1) a low, indistinct, continuous sound; 2) an indistinct, whispered, or confidential complaint; or 3) an abnormal sound, usually emanating from the heart that sometimes indicates a diseased condition. I am actually going to use all three definitions to better understand the meaning of this verse and the many implications behind this person we are going to refer to quite simply as ‘the complainer’.
The first portion of the definition, ‘a low, indistinct, continuous sound’, brings to mind an annoyance of some sort, whether it be a dripping faucet, a buzzing, or perhaps a quiet hiss of static. At any rate, what we can assume from these occurrences is that something is amiss and needs to be put right – a tightening of a valve, the riddance of a pest, or frequency adjustment. But oddly enough the actual adjustment needs to happen at the source of the complaint not at its recipient. If I am the hearer of these complaints, simply plugging my ears or leaving the room is not going to solve the situation, it simply prolongs the symptoms and in some cases can lend to catastrophic consequences. What I learn from this definition is that complaint all by itself is a sign that something is wrong at the source – with the one complaining.
The second definition, ‘an indistinct, whispered, or confidential complaint’ attacks the articulation and productivity of the complaint. One of the key components of communication is articulation. It is important to be able to convey a comprehensive concern to others if we ever expect a change to occur or action to be taken. The ‘whispered or confidential’ aspect of the definition, while having its place in seeking out counsel (counsel meaning you are procuring resolution and forward movement on an issue) does not have a place in the context of idle gossip. The difference between counsel and gossip is that counsel is meant to resolve issues whereas gossip is impotent and simply promotes discontentment and negativity.
The third definition, ‘an abnormal sound, usually emanating from the heart that sometimes indicates a diseased condition’ is the most profound of definitions when applied to the complainer. A murmur or complaint in this context can quite literally affect the entire performance of the body and incapacitate its growth, circulation, and effectiveness. Within the body of Christ this is a serious concern and one that should not be taken lightly.
There is an extreme difference between issuing a complaint and expressing a concern. A complaint has no fruitfulness, offers no solutions, creates discord and attacks the integrity of the body. An expressed concern, however, places expectations of change, offers progressive solutions, and promotes the well being and healthy functioning of the body.
I am exposed to complaints on a daily basis with my children. They have legitimate needs that must be met but often they cannot properly express those needs or articulate their concerns. My son, who is 10 months old resorts to fussing and crying. My daughter, who is 7 yrs old, is much better at expressing her needs and displaying healthy responses. My son’s needs are no less important than my daughter’s but his level of physical maturity inhibits him from properly conveying those needs to me in a manner that will generate immediate results. Much time and effort is wasted in an attempt to discern the appropriate need to meet. The same can be said of our spiritual maturity. When we complain, whimpering and whining about our present dissatisfaction without offering solutions, speaking coherently, or promoting the health of the body we display spiritual immaturity. Paul never meant to say that we must not express ourselves, our needs or our concerns. He was simply attacking the cowardice of impotent expression which manifests as complaints, leaving the believer devoid of growth which in turn stifles and plagues the body.
So the next time you think of issuing a complaint, try accompanying it with a productive solution, better articulation, and a sincere display of compassion for the well being of others. By doing this you will transform that complaint into a legitimate need worthy to be addressed and met; a need that when met will stimulate growth and flourish, creating fruitfulness and begetting life to everyone around.
Wednesday, August 4, 2010
Now I've seen it all...
Saturday, July 17, 2010
Jacob and Esa...errr...Edward?
“So the boys grew. And Esau was a skillful hunter, a man of the field; but Jacob was a mild man, dwelling in tents.” Genesis 25:27
I could not help but think of these apparent opposite brothers while watching the recent hit movies, The Twilight Saga: Twilight, New Moon, and Eclipse. It has taken me a while to completely analyze and understand the frenzy surrounding the extremes of Jacob and Edward, Bella’s two love interests in the series. But after careful thought and speculation I think I am finally able to comprehend what the allure is to women of all ages and walks of life.
Those who are unequivocally baffled by this craze are men, and rightly so; they sure didn’t see this coming. What could these two boys, not even yet men, possibly have to offer that so captivates young, middle aged, and old women alike? I would daresay, had I not done such extensive work on studying femininity, her image, and her patterns I may not have seen it either and been completely drawn into the debate of Team Edward vs. Team Jacob, mooning and fawning over the fantasy of my pick. But I’m not…at least not without understanding. So how did we arrive at the extreme of Jacob, the ferocious werewolf hunter, and Edward, the mild vegetarian vampire “tent dweller”?
Well, men… this may come as a shock, but they are beasts of your own making. You created them. How so you may ask? They are the extremes of masculinity demanded by the characteristics affirmed by men in women: the hot and heavy sensuous sex object and the unapproachable, untouchable ice princess. These extremes of femininity affirmed by men and not the image God created which is precariously balanced on His character and does not delve into these extremes, is what has demanded the imbalance in masculinity. In the beginning when God created male and female He made them dependent on one another for physical wholeness, definition, and fruitfulness as mankind. Because of the mystical interconnectivity between man and woman, what happens to woman inevitably affects what happens to man. Because of the unique role of men as initiators of the creative process, women cannot bring life to what you have not initiated or firstly given to her. And so it is for this reason that I lay the responsibility at your feet.
The ice princess filled with shame and loathing of her own femininity and sexuality, craves the raw and animalistic heat offered by Jacob. The sensuous sex object, reveling in and exploiting her own sexuality, desires the affirmation of her virtue and the cold emotionless and suppressed passion of Edward.
I define my view of femininity as created in God’s image from the characteristics of God’s Wisdom. While Wisdom is pure and submissive, she is also a mother. But the role of mother is impossible without the characteristics of sexuality somewhere along the line. An appropriate balance between the sexuality we possess and the modesty of purity is essential to purposefully creating life. In order to mar and upset this divinely reflected entity, the enemy must convince us to operate in extremes. The personification of these extremes is named, Folly. Quoting from my work, Made in Their Image (2008):
“Women have suffered an immense amount of shame associated with our sexuality. Throughout the Bible shame is always a degradation of glory or honor. “The wise inherit honor, but fools he holds up to shame” (Proverbs 3:35). We suffer shame when we lose sight of our glory. In today’s society we have reached a different attitude. We have thrown off our shame associated with our sexuality and embraced that sexuality. But because we did not perform this function with the image of God in mind we also threw off all respect, glory, and honor associated with our sexuality – the purity of it. Our faith does not allow us to embrace sexuality as the world has defined it for us and so we find ourselves pulled between the extremes of cessation in shame and sensation in vulgarity of our sexuality. This is how Folly functions. She works in the extremes of Wisdom, prowling around her character and looking for ways to distort her image. She does not care in which extreme she functions; she only cares that we do not realize the true intent, power, and divine reflection of our femininity.”
The greater the affirmations of women’s extremes become, the greater the demand for Edwards and Jacobs will also be. If a man’s intent is to affirm a woman’s sexuality with no regard for her holiness, he will need to become the unfeeling, undead Edward to combat the imbalance he has created. If a man desires the cold, emotionless and rigid stereotype of purity without affirmation of femininity’s need to bring forth life through her sexuality and the purity of that role, he must become Jacob to balance the extreme he has affirmed.
So to all my many male friends who have expressed their complete befuddlement of this trend, I say this: If you wish not to see the distortion and manipulation of your masculinity into these boys you simply do not want to be, then be cautious of how and what you affirm in women. If you choose to affirm the negative extremes of femininity around you, your divinely inspired confidence and humility will be warped into the grotesque disfigurement of Jacob’s arrogance and Edward’s cowardice, your divinely placed authority into the dominant viciousness of the alpha male and your command to serve femininity into the indecisive weakness of the impartial undead.
To all my dear female friends who are captivated by the idea of Edward or Jacob, use this knowledge to analyze your own femininity, what has or has not been affirmed, and what you are lacking to become uniquely balanced in God’s image.
And now, finally, the answer to the question you have all been awaiting: Which team am I supporting? Well… that is my own demon (no pun intended) to deal with.
I could not help but think of these apparent opposite brothers while watching the recent hit movies, The Twilight Saga: Twilight, New Moon, and Eclipse. It has taken me a while to completely analyze and understand the frenzy surrounding the extremes of Jacob and Edward, Bella’s two love interests in the series. But after careful thought and speculation I think I am finally able to comprehend what the allure is to women of all ages and walks of life.
Those who are unequivocally baffled by this craze are men, and rightly so; they sure didn’t see this coming. What could these two boys, not even yet men, possibly have to offer that so captivates young, middle aged, and old women alike? I would daresay, had I not done such extensive work on studying femininity, her image, and her patterns I may not have seen it either and been completely drawn into the debate of Team Edward vs. Team Jacob, mooning and fawning over the fantasy of my pick. But I’m not…at least not without understanding. So how did we arrive at the extreme of Jacob, the ferocious werewolf hunter, and Edward, the mild vegetarian vampire “tent dweller”?
Well, men… this may come as a shock, but they are beasts of your own making. You created them. How so you may ask? They are the extremes of masculinity demanded by the characteristics affirmed by men in women: the hot and heavy sensuous sex object and the unapproachable, untouchable ice princess. These extremes of femininity affirmed by men and not the image God created which is precariously balanced on His character and does not delve into these extremes, is what has demanded the imbalance in masculinity. In the beginning when God created male and female He made them dependent on one another for physical wholeness, definition, and fruitfulness as mankind. Because of the mystical interconnectivity between man and woman, what happens to woman inevitably affects what happens to man. Because of the unique role of men as initiators of the creative process, women cannot bring life to what you have not initiated or firstly given to her. And so it is for this reason that I lay the responsibility at your feet.
The ice princess filled with shame and loathing of her own femininity and sexuality, craves the raw and animalistic heat offered by Jacob. The sensuous sex object, reveling in and exploiting her own sexuality, desires the affirmation of her virtue and the cold emotionless and suppressed passion of Edward.
I define my view of femininity as created in God’s image from the characteristics of God’s Wisdom. While Wisdom is pure and submissive, she is also a mother. But the role of mother is impossible without the characteristics of sexuality somewhere along the line. An appropriate balance between the sexuality we possess and the modesty of purity is essential to purposefully creating life. In order to mar and upset this divinely reflected entity, the enemy must convince us to operate in extremes. The personification of these extremes is named, Folly. Quoting from my work, Made in Their Image (2008):
“Women have suffered an immense amount of shame associated with our sexuality. Throughout the Bible shame is always a degradation of glory or honor. “The wise inherit honor, but fools he holds up to shame” (Proverbs 3:35). We suffer shame when we lose sight of our glory. In today’s society we have reached a different attitude. We have thrown off our shame associated with our sexuality and embraced that sexuality. But because we did not perform this function with the image of God in mind we also threw off all respect, glory, and honor associated with our sexuality – the purity of it. Our faith does not allow us to embrace sexuality as the world has defined it for us and so we find ourselves pulled between the extremes of cessation in shame and sensation in vulgarity of our sexuality. This is how Folly functions. She works in the extremes of Wisdom, prowling around her character and looking for ways to distort her image. She does not care in which extreme she functions; she only cares that we do not realize the true intent, power, and divine reflection of our femininity.”
The greater the affirmations of women’s extremes become, the greater the demand for Edwards and Jacobs will also be. If a man’s intent is to affirm a woman’s sexuality with no regard for her holiness, he will need to become the unfeeling, undead Edward to combat the imbalance he has created. If a man desires the cold, emotionless and rigid stereotype of purity without affirmation of femininity’s need to bring forth life through her sexuality and the purity of that role, he must become Jacob to balance the extreme he has affirmed.
So to all my many male friends who have expressed their complete befuddlement of this trend, I say this: If you wish not to see the distortion and manipulation of your masculinity into these boys you simply do not want to be, then be cautious of how and what you affirm in women. If you choose to affirm the negative extremes of femininity around you, your divinely inspired confidence and humility will be warped into the grotesque disfigurement of Jacob’s arrogance and Edward’s cowardice, your divinely placed authority into the dominant viciousness of the alpha male and your command to serve femininity into the indecisive weakness of the impartial undead.
To all my dear female friends who are captivated by the idea of Edward or Jacob, use this knowledge to analyze your own femininity, what has or has not been affirmed, and what you are lacking to become uniquely balanced in God’s image.
And now, finally, the answer to the question you have all been awaiting: Which team am I supporting? Well… that is my own demon (no pun intended) to deal with.
Wednesday, June 16, 2010
Kindness in Action
This Sunday was our Church’s introductory Sunday into the Fruit of the Spirit, Kindness. Niqui, my fellow teacher, and I put together a definitional teaching on the fruit and in the process I learned a good deal about kindness that was all new to me. One of the things I learned is that kindness is not a passive response to others; it is a very active and intentional effort to extend service and respond appropriately to others. While studying some of the aspects of ‘response to others’, I encountered one of my weaknesses, listening.
Listening is a difficult skill to cultivate for me. I oftentimes find myself thinking ahead and formulating my answer to others instead of honing in and hanging on every word they say. So this week I am actively seeking out ways in which to practice my listening skills, my kindness, towards others.
A few weeks ago I had the opportunity to observe a forum of discussion offered to my particular age group (20’s – 30’s) by our elders. I was overwhelmed with gratefulness for the manner in which the forum was conducted. We were actively being listened to and not debated on what our dreams, visions, aspirations, hopes, and even gripes were in the area of ministry. I felt this was an incredible demonstration and powerful example given to us by our elders in the area of kindness and I want to thank you so much for teaching me by example, the art of listening.
As is usually the case with all effective teaching, I am motivated to act on and reciprocate the kindness. And so I would like to take this opportunity to offer up this particular blog to actively listen to my elders express the dreams, hopes, expectations and even gripes they have for my generation, uninterrupted. You exercised incredible kindness and self control in listening to us and now I want to sit at your feet and listen to you. What kinds of things motivate you in your ministry? How can we best help you, serve you, and empower you? In our desire for increased leadership and responsibility how can we best incorporate you into that pursuit and not run over or push you aside in the process? The only rules to this discussion are you must be 40+ to comment and no fighting. Simply express. I want to know, experience, and understand where you are coming from.
Listening is a difficult skill to cultivate for me. I oftentimes find myself thinking ahead and formulating my answer to others instead of honing in and hanging on every word they say. So this week I am actively seeking out ways in which to practice my listening skills, my kindness, towards others.
A few weeks ago I had the opportunity to observe a forum of discussion offered to my particular age group (20’s – 30’s) by our elders. I was overwhelmed with gratefulness for the manner in which the forum was conducted. We were actively being listened to and not debated on what our dreams, visions, aspirations, hopes, and even gripes were in the area of ministry. I felt this was an incredible demonstration and powerful example given to us by our elders in the area of kindness and I want to thank you so much for teaching me by example, the art of listening.
As is usually the case with all effective teaching, I am motivated to act on and reciprocate the kindness. And so I would like to take this opportunity to offer up this particular blog to actively listen to my elders express the dreams, hopes, expectations and even gripes they have for my generation, uninterrupted. You exercised incredible kindness and self control in listening to us and now I want to sit at your feet and listen to you. What kinds of things motivate you in your ministry? How can we best help you, serve you, and empower you? In our desire for increased leadership and responsibility how can we best incorporate you into that pursuit and not run over or push you aside in the process? The only rules to this discussion are you must be 40+ to comment and no fighting. Simply express. I want to know, experience, and understand where you are coming from.
Sunday, June 13, 2010
I See You
“Make every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace.” Ephesians 4:3
I finally watched the movie, Avatar, this week. At first I thought it was going to be a cheesy plot, brought solely to life by cool graphics, but about halfway through the movie I began to recognize some profound spiritual truths worked into the storyline. This always makes a movie worth watching for me because I am then able to use what I have learned to convey the gospel and God’s truths to others through a common interest or venue.
Throughout the course of the movie there was an underlying idea that all life is connected. In the past I have avoided this mentality in a pantheistic sense that the divine is in and through all things. While I do not believe that the divine is in everything I do believe that in the physical world, all life is connected. And likewise, in the spiritual realm, all divine life is connected. Our interconnectivity is not taken seriously when we fail to realize that every decision we make is going to impact others around us in some manner.
In Avatar, the earthly deity, Eywa (eerily close in pronunciation to Yahweh) can feel every disturbance in the life force of the planet she supports and she groans over and grieves these disturbances. Life of any kind is extremely important to the natives, the Na’vi. The Na’vi people have a phrase they use to honor and respect the life in every living being. (This phrase is also used as a greeting amongst some native American tribes.)
I see you.
I see you as a living being, as part of the ecosystem, as a life that affects me, and I respect that life even when we may be in conflict with each other. When I heard this phrase it struck a chord in my spirit. I thought of Christ who lives in those of us that are believers in Him. In Christ we live, and move and have our being. - Acts 17:28. As believers in Christ we are all interconnected in the Spirit and are bonded together.
All too often we forget our interconnectivity and we attempt to sever our bonds and ties. But if the impact of those severed ties avidly seen in the physical realm is so great then it stands to reason that the spiritual realm would function much the same way and the ties I sever with one brother or sister will ultimately have a cataclysmic effect on our spiritual ecosystem and is going to hurt the “body of Christ”. We may think that putting distance between us and those we have difficulty with will somehow lessen our discomfort and unpleasantness in the body but in all actuality even the slightest whisper of movement in one part of our world can have a tremendous effect on another part of the world. And so what we must do is strive (make every effort) with great love to hold together the bond of peace that the Spirit offers us through Christ.
When we sever these ties do we really, truly see Christ in our fellow believers? Does Jesus Christ in me, look at and recognize Jesus Christ in you? He should. Do I see others through the eyes of Christ? Christ in me, should look around at others and say…
I see you.
Even when we are at odds with one another, that is alright. I heard a sermon recently on the growth opportunities one may find in and through conflict. What I took away from that was this: There is going to be conflict; we are going to disagree. I may not agree with you but I see you, and honor, respect the life of Christ that is in you.
I see you.
When we refuse to see each other and honor the divine life that exists in each and every one of us who believe in Christ then we grieve and disturb the Holy Spirit who is attempting to bond us all in peace. My brothers and sisters, no matter what our differences are or where we experience conflict, I wish you to know that I see you. Christ that is in me recognizes Christ that is in you. You are an influential and important part of my spiritual ecosystem and I appreciate, respect and honor the life that is in you.
If we cannot look at one another and truly see through the eyes of Christ then there may be something wrong with our perspective. We ought to seek earnestly the ability to see others as Christ sees them. And so when I find myself devaluing or looking past others I will diligently pray for them and for the eyes of Christ until...
I see you.
I finally watched the movie, Avatar, this week. At first I thought it was going to be a cheesy plot, brought solely to life by cool graphics, but about halfway through the movie I began to recognize some profound spiritual truths worked into the storyline. This always makes a movie worth watching for me because I am then able to use what I have learned to convey the gospel and God’s truths to others through a common interest or venue.
Throughout the course of the movie there was an underlying idea that all life is connected. In the past I have avoided this mentality in a pantheistic sense that the divine is in and through all things. While I do not believe that the divine is in everything I do believe that in the physical world, all life is connected. And likewise, in the spiritual realm, all divine life is connected. Our interconnectivity is not taken seriously when we fail to realize that every decision we make is going to impact others around us in some manner.
In Avatar, the earthly deity, Eywa (eerily close in pronunciation to Yahweh) can feel every disturbance in the life force of the planet she supports and she groans over and grieves these disturbances. Life of any kind is extremely important to the natives, the Na’vi. The Na’vi people have a phrase they use to honor and respect the life in every living being. (This phrase is also used as a greeting amongst some native American tribes.)
I see you.
I see you as a living being, as part of the ecosystem, as a life that affects me, and I respect that life even when we may be in conflict with each other. When I heard this phrase it struck a chord in my spirit. I thought of Christ who lives in those of us that are believers in Him. In Christ we live, and move and have our being. - Acts 17:28. As believers in Christ we are all interconnected in the Spirit and are bonded together.
All too often we forget our interconnectivity and we attempt to sever our bonds and ties. But if the impact of those severed ties avidly seen in the physical realm is so great then it stands to reason that the spiritual realm would function much the same way and the ties I sever with one brother or sister will ultimately have a cataclysmic effect on our spiritual ecosystem and is going to hurt the “body of Christ”. We may think that putting distance between us and those we have difficulty with will somehow lessen our discomfort and unpleasantness in the body but in all actuality even the slightest whisper of movement in one part of our world can have a tremendous effect on another part of the world. And so what we must do is strive (make every effort) with great love to hold together the bond of peace that the Spirit offers us through Christ.
When we sever these ties do we really, truly see Christ in our fellow believers? Does Jesus Christ in me, look at and recognize Jesus Christ in you? He should. Do I see others through the eyes of Christ? Christ in me, should look around at others and say…
I see you.
Even when we are at odds with one another, that is alright. I heard a sermon recently on the growth opportunities one may find in and through conflict. What I took away from that was this: There is going to be conflict; we are going to disagree. I may not agree with you but I see you, and honor, respect the life of Christ that is in you.
I see you.
When we refuse to see each other and honor the divine life that exists in each and every one of us who believe in Christ then we grieve and disturb the Holy Spirit who is attempting to bond us all in peace. My brothers and sisters, no matter what our differences are or where we experience conflict, I wish you to know that I see you. Christ that is in me recognizes Christ that is in you. You are an influential and important part of my spiritual ecosystem and I appreciate, respect and honor the life that is in you.
If we cannot look at one another and truly see through the eyes of Christ then there may be something wrong with our perspective. We ought to seek earnestly the ability to see others as Christ sees them. And so when I find myself devaluing or looking past others I will diligently pray for them and for the eyes of Christ until...
I see you.
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Proprietary in the Kingdom?
“…and He has filled him with the Spirit of God, in wisdom and understanding, in knowledge and all manner of workmanship…” Exodus 35:31
Repeatedly throughout the book of Exodus we see God endowing the children of Israel with wisdom, knowledge and understanding for all manner of craftsmanship, workmanship, and leadership. I do not imagine that following their grasp of situations they sat amongst themselves and debated patents or copyrights. The people fully understood that the knowledge they so recently found themselves privy to was entirely from God. We seem to have lost this ability over the last few thousand years.
I have wondered often if this pattern existed in the early church. Can you imagine Matthew, Mark, Luke and John suing each other over coming up with the same story? Well… no. We understand today that there was a purpose and reason for having the same story told from four different viewpoints. Is the same God that orchestrated those circumstances still in control of His Church? As I look over the history of the Church I see the same thing occurring over and over. Every time there is a great surge forward in the Church, it is a result of several contributors all moving in the Spirit and approaching the topic from different vantage points. The reformation was a prime example of this happening in history. We attribute much of the reformation to Martin Luther but there were many other emerging leaders of that time that were preaching a similar message independent of each other. Johannes Hus, John Wycliffe, and John Calvin among a few were all influencing voices of their time. They all condemned the practices of the existing Church and ushered in a message of grace. Although they all seemed to come from a different viewpoint you can clearly see in retrospect that the Spirit of God was moving in and through these men to reform the Church and bring her closer to God.
A more contemporary example is the movement in teaching and expounding on spiritual gifts and how they are to be used in the body of Christ. Some names that pop out at us from this movement are Charles Stanley, Brian Carraway, Bill Gothard, and many other names that are denomination specific. I am not condemning or espousing any particular view, just suggesting that perhaps there is something greater than just one man that God is trying to teach His Church so that we may learn and grow.
In a more personal example, I wrote a book in 2008 that I was a bit nervous about as I had not heard anyone else teach on this particular topic or viewpoint. I slowly and cautiously sought counsel and input on the information presented. One year later a friend forwarded me an audio clip of a woman teaching on the same topic. Not only was it the same topic but it seemed as if she had followed the same exact course of research that I had followed. I experienced several emotions at that time. One emotion was panic as the prideful side of me wanted to cling to what I thought was mine. But another was tremendous relief that I was not crazy or far-fetched in my conclusions. I realized at that point that I had no right to feel envy over her platform and that I should be praising God that truth was prevailing and coming forward to provide insight and healing to others.
In another personal example a few years ago my sister had been praying long and hard about the direction of women’s ministry in her church and district and had come up with what she felt was a truly Spirit-led model to follow. Not long after that someone else was recognized and praised for the exact model she had come with and I recall she was devastated over this development. I knew exactly how she felt but I also knew how to encourage her. There were two possible options for why this occurred. The first is that perhaps God was moving in a major way amongst the women of her denomination and had given the same plan to several different people to assure that it would be implemented. After all, do we not see that God has done this over and over throughout history? The second option is that the person knew she it was a model she had proposed and failed to give credit where credit was due. It happens… it is rude… but it happens and is usually just a result of professional ignorance and underdevelopment. Time and maturity usually cure this.
*On a side note, it really is important to recognize others for their contributions no matter what. It is a tremendously powerful way to exhort, encourage, and confirm to an individual the validity of their own spiritual maturity and development. We empower one another when we appropriately attribute credit to one another; we tear the body down when we do not.
And now we arrive at the motivation behind why I felt the need to write this particular blog. It had to do with a particular status update on my “not-so-healthy” pastime, Facebook. One man was giving an update on the exciting new and transformational things happening in his church. One of the readers commented that he was simply copying another man’s ministry model. Now I am not going to deduce anyone’s motives I am merely interpreting this in the manner with which it came across to me. I know both of these men and have seen them “do” ministry over the last 30 years. Both are fully capable of hearing from God and allowing His Spirit to work and move through them. Both men are also extremely mature in spiritual matters and courtesy and would never take credit for the others’ work without giving proper credit. So knowing both these men the way that I do, I must conclude that both are hearing the same message from God on what He desires for the next step of growth in His Church. Its application and implementation will take on many different forms because the men’s ministries and gifts are different. My assessment is that no one is copying anyone else’s ministry model; they are simply listening to the SAME God and following His direction. It is the role of the Spirit to bind and unite us together to serve as one body and we may have faith that He is indeed doing this. Ministry models do not belong to man... they belong to God. We are only conduits of His greater plan.
And so I end this post with some suggestions. 1) Give credit to one another, building each other up, when we discover and recognize truths. 2) Ask God what He is attempting to teach the Church on a grander scale when you notice a pattern in teaching and ministry. 3) Acknowledge that the true reward for listening to God and following His direction will ultimately be rewarded when we stand before His throne and He says to us, “Well done, my good and faithful servant.” 4) And finally, we are a Church that is built on love and as such there is no place for pride and envy in a healthy Church. Let go of your personal proprietary concerns and celebrate the purposes of God expanding, growing and coming into fullness.
Repeatedly throughout the book of Exodus we see God endowing the children of Israel with wisdom, knowledge and understanding for all manner of craftsmanship, workmanship, and leadership. I do not imagine that following their grasp of situations they sat amongst themselves and debated patents or copyrights. The people fully understood that the knowledge they so recently found themselves privy to was entirely from God. We seem to have lost this ability over the last few thousand years.
I have wondered often if this pattern existed in the early church. Can you imagine Matthew, Mark, Luke and John suing each other over coming up with the same story? Well… no. We understand today that there was a purpose and reason for having the same story told from four different viewpoints. Is the same God that orchestrated those circumstances still in control of His Church? As I look over the history of the Church I see the same thing occurring over and over. Every time there is a great surge forward in the Church, it is a result of several contributors all moving in the Spirit and approaching the topic from different vantage points. The reformation was a prime example of this happening in history. We attribute much of the reformation to Martin Luther but there were many other emerging leaders of that time that were preaching a similar message independent of each other. Johannes Hus, John Wycliffe, and John Calvin among a few were all influencing voices of their time. They all condemned the practices of the existing Church and ushered in a message of grace. Although they all seemed to come from a different viewpoint you can clearly see in retrospect that the Spirit of God was moving in and through these men to reform the Church and bring her closer to God.
A more contemporary example is the movement in teaching and expounding on spiritual gifts and how they are to be used in the body of Christ. Some names that pop out at us from this movement are Charles Stanley, Brian Carraway, Bill Gothard, and many other names that are denomination specific. I am not condemning or espousing any particular view, just suggesting that perhaps there is something greater than just one man that God is trying to teach His Church so that we may learn and grow.
In a more personal example, I wrote a book in 2008 that I was a bit nervous about as I had not heard anyone else teach on this particular topic or viewpoint. I slowly and cautiously sought counsel and input on the information presented. One year later a friend forwarded me an audio clip of a woman teaching on the same topic. Not only was it the same topic but it seemed as if she had followed the same exact course of research that I had followed. I experienced several emotions at that time. One emotion was panic as the prideful side of me wanted to cling to what I thought was mine. But another was tremendous relief that I was not crazy or far-fetched in my conclusions. I realized at that point that I had no right to feel envy over her platform and that I should be praising God that truth was prevailing and coming forward to provide insight and healing to others.
In another personal example a few years ago my sister had been praying long and hard about the direction of women’s ministry in her church and district and had come up with what she felt was a truly Spirit-led model to follow. Not long after that someone else was recognized and praised for the exact model she had come with and I recall she was devastated over this development. I knew exactly how she felt but I also knew how to encourage her. There were two possible options for why this occurred. The first is that perhaps God was moving in a major way amongst the women of her denomination and had given the same plan to several different people to assure that it would be implemented. After all, do we not see that God has done this over and over throughout history? The second option is that the person knew she it was a model she had proposed and failed to give credit where credit was due. It happens… it is rude… but it happens and is usually just a result of professional ignorance and underdevelopment. Time and maturity usually cure this.
*On a side note, it really is important to recognize others for their contributions no matter what. It is a tremendously powerful way to exhort, encourage, and confirm to an individual the validity of their own spiritual maturity and development. We empower one another when we appropriately attribute credit to one another; we tear the body down when we do not.
And now we arrive at the motivation behind why I felt the need to write this particular blog. It had to do with a particular status update on my “not-so-healthy” pastime, Facebook. One man was giving an update on the exciting new and transformational things happening in his church. One of the readers commented that he was simply copying another man’s ministry model. Now I am not going to deduce anyone’s motives I am merely interpreting this in the manner with which it came across to me. I know both of these men and have seen them “do” ministry over the last 30 years. Both are fully capable of hearing from God and allowing His Spirit to work and move through them. Both men are also extremely mature in spiritual matters and courtesy and would never take credit for the others’ work without giving proper credit. So knowing both these men the way that I do, I must conclude that both are hearing the same message from God on what He desires for the next step of growth in His Church. Its application and implementation will take on many different forms because the men’s ministries and gifts are different. My assessment is that no one is copying anyone else’s ministry model; they are simply listening to the SAME God and following His direction. It is the role of the Spirit to bind and unite us together to serve as one body and we may have faith that He is indeed doing this. Ministry models do not belong to man... they belong to God. We are only conduits of His greater plan.
And so I end this post with some suggestions. 1) Give credit to one another, building each other up, when we discover and recognize truths. 2) Ask God what He is attempting to teach the Church on a grander scale when you notice a pattern in teaching and ministry. 3) Acknowledge that the true reward for listening to God and following His direction will ultimately be rewarded when we stand before His throne and He says to us, “Well done, my good and faithful servant.” 4) And finally, we are a Church that is built on love and as such there is no place for pride and envy in a healthy Church. Let go of your personal proprietary concerns and celebrate the purposes of God expanding, growing and coming into fullness.
Saturday, May 1, 2010
Priorities...
Well folks... sorry I haven't been blogging lately. I have some pressing deadlines that are forcing me to place blogging on the back burner. I'm in the middle of a medical transcription course that I need to finish up in the next 2 or so months. As soon as I have finished the course I will be back at it with studying and blogging on the Word! I have also taken on more responsibilities with my church and am teaching again which is also a priority over my personal love of blogging. I do plan on posting some of the teaching eventually... when I find the time. Declan is keeping me busy too. He is almost mobile and I'm looking forward to spending my summer chasing him around.
In book news I have decided not to pursue publishing for now but would love to make it available to anyone who would like to read it. All input is welcome. I wrote it with women in mind and think it would be a fabulous tool for anyone counseling adult women or raising young women. It is also beneficial to men and in particular men in ministry as I believe it clarifies some important feminine characteristics of God and how those aspects of His character are not to be misused, abused, taken advantage of, or exploited. I believe it also fine tunes some perspectives on women in leadership and ministry. Email me or drop me an FB note and I will send it to you. I would love to bless you with it! By the way, if you have already read it feel free to comment or blurb on this post if you think it would benefit others.
I miss interacting with everyone via blogging and will be back soon!!
In book news I have decided not to pursue publishing for now but would love to make it available to anyone who would like to read it. All input is welcome. I wrote it with women in mind and think it would be a fabulous tool for anyone counseling adult women or raising young women. It is also beneficial to men and in particular men in ministry as I believe it clarifies some important feminine characteristics of God and how those aspects of His character are not to be misused, abused, taken advantage of, or exploited. I believe it also fine tunes some perspectives on women in leadership and ministry. Email me or drop me an FB note and I will send it to you. I would love to bless you with it! By the way, if you have already read it feel free to comment or blurb on this post if you think it would benefit others.
I miss interacting with everyone via blogging and will be back soon!!
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Forever Young
This year I will be 33. I remember when I turned 30, it was a year full of reflection and introspection. That year was pivotal for me, as it is for so many others as well, in that I realized God was calling me to a new phase in life. One of the questions I asked God at the time was whether or not I was supposed to be doing this all along and had I missed a turn somewhere in life only to be redirected this way ten years later. His answer was twofold. Yes, this had been His plan for me all along. And no, I was to be doing this in His timing. That timing was not ten years ago nor would it be ten years from now. His timing was now. I thought that was odd as I’ve always been under the impression that a person’s ministry is something they’re called to in High School or College and then you plan your career accordingly. I never expected to actually be doing something in the area of ministry because my career started off differently and took me different places in life. Six years in the Air Force, followed by several years working for government contractors and I just assumed I would be doing that my entire life and that was God’s only plan for me.
As I came to an understanding of what I was to be doing, at least in the present, I encountered some confusion about God’s timing. You see, I qualify as part of a group known as “the emerging generation”. This group consists of adults ages 25-35. Everywhere I turn I see this term and the excitement that surrounds these people as they are poured into and molded into leaders and disciples. Where the confusion came was in the recognition of how long it would take for God to bring about what He was doing in me. What I saw Him doing in and through me would take several years to bring to fruition. I began to question God. “God, are you sure about this? Can you work any faster? I’m going to miss my window.” Wait… what? What window? Did I just tell God that I was unusable for His purposes outside of some worldly definition wrapped up in this term “emerging”?
Where on earth would I get such a ridiculous notion? That really began to irk me as I realized I had been thinking in immature terms as being part of some elite clique or sorority. How’s that for maturing and growing up? But I did succeed in tracking down my destructive train of thought. These thoughts had all flooded in when I faced the reality of turning 33 this year and in an almost panicked urgency felt the need to point out to God that He only had 2 years left to get me where He wanted me. Yikes! How foolish. But I do not think I am alone. There is a particular anticipation that accompanies the approach of an individuals 30’s. And rightly so. It is at this age that certain mental and physiological changes take place that bring a person into the fullness of adulthood. I believe this is the reason God always called people into positions of active ministry at the age of 30. Physically our brains are mature enough to take on the challenge. Sure we can receive a calling or anointing early on in life but the 30’s seemed to be the age of plans put into action. In fact, Jesus was also 30 when he “emerged” and visibly began his outreach and ministry. He was 33 when he died. But that was not the end of his life… nor was it technically the beginning. The Word of the ages who was with God in the beginning may have been physically 33 but it was just an age. The physical death and aging that permeates this world could not hold him and force him to do its bidding. While he may appear to be 33 yet to this day… he is older than all. Is this not the same Christ that lives in me and brings my spirit to life? It stands to reason then that the age of my spirit were one to see it in a physical sense would be 33. When I am 80, the spirit of Christ that is in me will still look 33. What then was I so worried about? Here is where the problem entered.
A few years ago a friend told me about a conference most of her younger ministry friends were invited to. When I asked her if she would be attending she told me that sadly she and her husband were not invited because they were over the 35 yr old age limit. I was shocked. Here they were at the same place in ministry as others, being cultivated and mentored for leadership but because they had initially followed other career paths, they were at a different stage physically than their peers. Yet the overall message was clear, “Sorry, you are too old to be in our clique.” And so a few years later I find myself trapped in the same box only this one I locked myself into. What I had failed to realize is that there are phases in every persons walk with God and as we prepare to enter each new stage we must “emerge” from the old. “Emerging” is about new beginnings.
Over the last two years I have watched my parents go from thinking they would retire soon to becoming reactivated as missionaries. The transformation was more than just employers. There was an actual physical impact I saw in and through them. The realization that God was not finished with them had a distinct rejuvenating effect on them. At one point I looked at my mother when she laughed and saw decades melt away. She was once again 30 something, filled with anticipation and hope as she prepared to transition to life in Brazil. I learned something new that day about what it meant to be “emerging”. I watched my mother “emerge” from a shell of resigned ending to a life of new beginnings. My mother and father, now in their 60’s were the definition of “emerging leaders”.
This year I have also watched my sister and brother-in-law, after 20+ years of service to their country as Navy Chaplains approach a new phase in life as they prepare to become civilians and begin pastoring. I saw the transformation happen in them as well. They went from a mental state of military retirement to one of new beginnings. I watched them “emerge” from their past careers into the dawning of a new day and new career.
And so today as I sit here and write, I am rejuvenated and encouraged as I realize that whatever age or phase of life you are in, it is always God’s plan that just around the corner is a brand new opportunity for you to “emerge”. My tasks right now may consist of caring for my house and feeding my children but the day will come when I will “emerge” to care for His house and feed His children. To confine the term of “emerging leaders” to a physical age group is just plain immature and elitist. Feel free to gore me for my views but if it is the task of the elderly to pour into the young then perhaps we should be asking in what manner we can reciprocate. I encourage you today, if you feel that you are past the age of usefulness to God and to His people, then snap out of it! You are destined to emerge! It is the nature of Christ and it is now your nature. God calls to us, “Come out, my people”. Emerge, live, and help others to live.
As I came to an understanding of what I was to be doing, at least in the present, I encountered some confusion about God’s timing. You see, I qualify as part of a group known as “the emerging generation”. This group consists of adults ages 25-35. Everywhere I turn I see this term and the excitement that surrounds these people as they are poured into and molded into leaders and disciples. Where the confusion came was in the recognition of how long it would take for God to bring about what He was doing in me. What I saw Him doing in and through me would take several years to bring to fruition. I began to question God. “God, are you sure about this? Can you work any faster? I’m going to miss my window.” Wait… what? What window? Did I just tell God that I was unusable for His purposes outside of some worldly definition wrapped up in this term “emerging”?
Where on earth would I get such a ridiculous notion? That really began to irk me as I realized I had been thinking in immature terms as being part of some elite clique or sorority. How’s that for maturing and growing up? But I did succeed in tracking down my destructive train of thought. These thoughts had all flooded in when I faced the reality of turning 33 this year and in an almost panicked urgency felt the need to point out to God that He only had 2 years left to get me where He wanted me. Yikes! How foolish. But I do not think I am alone. There is a particular anticipation that accompanies the approach of an individuals 30’s. And rightly so. It is at this age that certain mental and physiological changes take place that bring a person into the fullness of adulthood. I believe this is the reason God always called people into positions of active ministry at the age of 30. Physically our brains are mature enough to take on the challenge. Sure we can receive a calling or anointing early on in life but the 30’s seemed to be the age of plans put into action. In fact, Jesus was also 30 when he “emerged” and visibly began his outreach and ministry. He was 33 when he died. But that was not the end of his life… nor was it technically the beginning. The Word of the ages who was with God in the beginning may have been physically 33 but it was just an age. The physical death and aging that permeates this world could not hold him and force him to do its bidding. While he may appear to be 33 yet to this day… he is older than all. Is this not the same Christ that lives in me and brings my spirit to life? It stands to reason then that the age of my spirit were one to see it in a physical sense would be 33. When I am 80, the spirit of Christ that is in me will still look 33. What then was I so worried about? Here is where the problem entered.
A few years ago a friend told me about a conference most of her younger ministry friends were invited to. When I asked her if she would be attending she told me that sadly she and her husband were not invited because they were over the 35 yr old age limit. I was shocked. Here they were at the same place in ministry as others, being cultivated and mentored for leadership but because they had initially followed other career paths, they were at a different stage physically than their peers. Yet the overall message was clear, “Sorry, you are too old to be in our clique.” And so a few years later I find myself trapped in the same box only this one I locked myself into. What I had failed to realize is that there are phases in every persons walk with God and as we prepare to enter each new stage we must “emerge” from the old. “Emerging” is about new beginnings.
Over the last two years I have watched my parents go from thinking they would retire soon to becoming reactivated as missionaries. The transformation was more than just employers. There was an actual physical impact I saw in and through them. The realization that God was not finished with them had a distinct rejuvenating effect on them. At one point I looked at my mother when she laughed and saw decades melt away. She was once again 30 something, filled with anticipation and hope as she prepared to transition to life in Brazil. I learned something new that day about what it meant to be “emerging”. I watched my mother “emerge” from a shell of resigned ending to a life of new beginnings. My mother and father, now in their 60’s were the definition of “emerging leaders”.
This year I have also watched my sister and brother-in-law, after 20+ years of service to their country as Navy Chaplains approach a new phase in life as they prepare to become civilians and begin pastoring. I saw the transformation happen in them as well. They went from a mental state of military retirement to one of new beginnings. I watched them “emerge” from their past careers into the dawning of a new day and new career.
And so today as I sit here and write, I am rejuvenated and encouraged as I realize that whatever age or phase of life you are in, it is always God’s plan that just around the corner is a brand new opportunity for you to “emerge”. My tasks right now may consist of caring for my house and feeding my children but the day will come when I will “emerge” to care for His house and feed His children. To confine the term of “emerging leaders” to a physical age group is just plain immature and elitist. Feel free to gore me for my views but if it is the task of the elderly to pour into the young then perhaps we should be asking in what manner we can reciprocate. I encourage you today, if you feel that you are past the age of usefulness to God and to His people, then snap out of it! You are destined to emerge! It is the nature of Christ and it is now your nature. God calls to us, “Come out, my people”. Emerge, live, and help others to live.
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Why Forgive?
2 Cor 2:7 “…you ought rather to forgive and comfort him lest perhaps such a one be swallowed up with too much sorrow. Therefore I urge you to reaffirm your love to him.”
I have been thinking a lot over the last year about the concept of forgiveness. The more I thought on it and compared my understanding against scripture the more I realized I was not properly grasping the motivation and intent behind forgiveness. I had always assumed that forgiveness on my part was for myself; that I had to forgive so that I would feel better and be able to move past the offense. While this may be a byproduct of forgiveness it is not the proper intent behind the act of forgiveness. I would never say that God forgives me so that He can feel better about His situation and move on. Why does God forgive me and shouldn’t his reasons for forgiving also be my reasons for forgiving? We are told in Matthew that God’s forgiveness to us is proportional in some degree to our forgiveness of others. And so I must assume from that, that my forgiveness should bear similarities to the forgiveness of God. Why then does God forgive?
God forgives, not for Himself but so that I may be freed of my debt. I am never under the impression that I do not owe God the debt of my very life for what sin I have committed and that even that payment is not sufficient. But God does not hold that over my head. I do not deserve forgiveness and yet He gives it so that I can be free from the consequences of death. If God did not offer forgiveness through the shed blood of His Son, Jesus Christ then I would be trapped in a state of sin and guilt. And so God’s intent in forgiveness is to free me, whether I ever come to realize it or not.
I was plagued recently with the idea that perhaps forgiveness was not necessary on my part if the offending party did not know they had wronged me or would even admit to it. It sounded good to me and offered a level of comfort and justice. But as I analyzed God’s forgiveness I could not reconcile my thought with His actions. Whether or not a person chooses to accept God’s forgiveness does not change the fact that He has given it. God has given it in the hope that someday I will recognize my pathetic state and accept His offer to cancel my debt. So how does that impact my decision to forgive? I must forgive no matter what. It does not hinge on the acknowledgement of the offending party…at least for my part. Nor should I forgive out of some sense of self righteousness – “I forgave you, therefore I am the better person.” What kind of gross nonsense is that anyway?
Forgiveness is then for the benefit of others first and that should always be my motivation. If God forgives for the benefit of mankind and not His own then my motivation should be out of a greater love for my fellow man. Do I truly love others enough to set them free through the act of my forgiveness? Or do I begrudge them that freedom in hopes of elevating myself and enslaving them in a prison of guilt? At the end of all this there is indeed a benefit to myself but it should not be my primary motivation. The benefit to myself is a truly genuine and sincere relationship with others, free from the condemnation of sin and guilt... which by the way is exactly the same benefit God receives through the act of forgiveness to me. His primary objective however has always been His love for me and desire for my freedom. Out of that offering of forgiveness and my freedom, I am then able to enjoy a truly sincere relationship with my Creator.
We must then ask ourselves why are we forgiving or not forgiving others? Is our motivation self serving? “I am now the better person.” Or is it focused on the freedom of others? “Through my actions I will make him a better person”. I think this has been the hardest question for me this year as it has forced me to examine my heart and motives. Do I forgive so that others will look at me and think how great or merciful I am or do I forgive to free others? May we be true instruments of Christ; aiding in the setting free of our fellow man that we may not prolong his sorrow and that through the act of forgiveness we may enter into genuine relationships with one another.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)